Gransnet forums

News & politics

Is the UK now on a "war footing"?

(129 Posts)
Wyllow3 Tue 03-Jun-25 12:09:35

Several news outlets are using this as a headline, somewhat OTT imo, but I'm referring to the Review published yesterday by the government and of course the different POV around how much we can spend and the timing of changes (and tax implications!)

The basics:

The review of Armed Forces came out yesterday, it was the first one since 2010.

"Led by Lord Robertson – a former defence secretary and Nato secretary general who conducted Labour’s last defence review in 1998 – it has consulted 150 external experts, received 8,000 submissions to a call for evidence, and runs to 48,000 words"

Apparently "the armed forces “lack the mass, resilience and internal coherence necessary to maintain a deterrent effect and sustain prolonged conflict”. Philip Stephens of the Financial Times wrote that those conclusions “are viewed within Whitehall as wholly uncontroversial”. There are 62 recommendations all of which the government accepted.

There are lots of detail in the all the newspapers, with disagreements about is it enough and is it soon enough.

As well as an increase in troops the main shift takes account of new ways of warfare (AI, robots, lasers) and a fundamental change in the overall picture of what the threats are, and of course how much we should spend on the military as opposed to other needs.

(I noticed that the government are considering a scheme where young people can do an optional one year sampling of military life (as opposed to Sunak's ideas of a compulsory military service)

news.sky.com/story/ai-robots-lasers-and-gap-years-in-armed-forces-key-details-as-uk-to-become-battle-ready-13378251
is a good summary

Whitewavemark2 Tue 03-Jun-25 20:11:52

I worry that we are all (I mean countries) going to talk ourselves into and find ourselves at war by some self fulfilling prophecy. Rather like WW1.

Skydancer Tue 03-Jun-25 21:21:29

Whitewavemark2

I worry that we are all (I mean countries) going to talk ourselves into and find ourselves at war by some self fulfilling prophecy. Rather like WW1.

This is how I feel. I think at some point in the not too distant future one country will take a big chance and invade another. Then someone, feeling they have no option, will push the button. I don’t think it’s far off. I have no faith in any of the men in charge.

M0nica Tue 03-Jun-25 22:12:03

Wyllow3

Perhaps there is space for these school leavers if its the one year scheme - someone said this on another board -

If its young people with no qualifications, someone has to cook, medical orderlies, stock food and equipment, clean uniforms, mend vehicles, help dig people out in national emergencies..

If they do have qualifications, it could be a doorway for those with qualifications to deciding whether they are interested in a career like this whatever their skills are.

All cooks, medical orderlies, logistics and engineering soldiers are also highly trained combat soldiers . Soldiers clean their own uniforms and none of the jobs you mention in an army milieu are gig jobs suitable for the untrained and unqualified.

The most appropriate way of training these eager young recruits would be through the territorial army framework, not the main army, who are too small in number and as a result too busy keeping themselves fighting ready to deal with a bunch of raw enthusiastic young people eager to earn money in their gap year.

Allira Tue 03-Jun-25 23:11:49

Whitewavemark2

I worry that we are all (I mean countries) going to talk ourselves into and find ourselves at war by some self fulfilling prophecy. Rather like WW1.

That is a worry.

Wyllow3 Wed 04-Jun-25 00:44:04

I guess it will be all about the nature of the scheme and eligibility Monica.

Lovetopaint037 Wed 04-Jun-25 04:07:56

Whitewavemark2

Also bear in mind that defence is one of any country’s primary functions.

Absolutely. I remember as a child my father who usually voted Labour changing to Tory.Iasked him why and he said you can’t vote for a government that doesn’t support defence. In the past when there was talk of doing away with Trident the excuse was that “we had America!!!” Recent events show that we need to invest in defence as a priority. Years of reducing all aspects of our defence in an effort to balance the books has left us in a vulnerable position and dependent on America which recent events has shown clearly was a major mistake. Talk of sovereignty as a major reason for Brexit is nonsense when we cannot defend ourselves and all the parading of our so called status in the world when the reality is that we are in fact an underfunded small country within a huge global community.We need to join with Europe and provide a strength which is needed to defend ourselves from tyrants such as Putin and mad men like Trump. I commend Starmer.

M0nica Wed 04-Jun-25 07:04:10

Brexit was a victory for the ingrained zenophobia of the British public. Anyone who has any experience of living or travelling in Europe will be more than convinced that each country has kept its unique national virtues, vices and - their sovereignity -, whatever that might mean.

If nothing else you can always tell when you have crossed a country boundary because the domestic architecture changes.

nanna8 Wed 04-Jun-25 07:54:37

Ingrained xenophobia? I wouldn’t have thought that.

ronib Wed 04-Jun-25 08:04:57

Richard North in Turbulent Times today gives a position much more in line with the majority view I imagine. I too was completely turned off by Starmer’s speech- Churchill he is not. Very difficult to buy into this government at the moment.

PoliticsNerd Wed 04-Jun-25 08:07:16

winterwhite

I feel a bit sceptical about this. Chronic under resourcing is not unique to the armed forces among our public services. Any of them could produce an equally damning review.
Not sure how I will view it if this govt raises tax to fund defence when it will not do so to fund social care and is proposing cuts to welfare benefits.

Except for the blinkered few I'm sure most are aware of the underfunding of all our public services. This is one step in the direction of turning this around and I agree with others that this optional version is an excellent idea.

Of course no one wants war! However, the best way to let it happen is to be unprepared. This is a small part of a very large review.

PoliticsNerd Wed 04-Jun-25 08:09:01

Sorry Winterwhite I didn't mean to quote you on that. My post was general not in answer to yours. (More haste, more mistakes!).

Grantanow Wed 04-Jun-25 09:27:14

Taxes must rise otherwise there's no money.

PoliticsNerd Wed 04-Jun-25 09:56:36

I don't think it's quite that simple Grantanow. For instance, more jobs and higher incomes raise taxes. A lower demand for particular resources lower the costs.

Whatever you do it's like building a wall - it has to be done from the base up.

Oreo Wed 04-Jun-25 10:04:43

nanna8

You never want war. It is awful, beyond awful. The uk tends to get involved in wars and I hope the politicians think very ,very hard before they lead people into death. It would be good if only those in positions of power fought the wars and left the rest of us alone. It is always someone else’s fault somehow.

Hey what a good idea!😄Government against government only.
Starmer and Putin go head to head in a wrestling match, Trump and Kim can go for nets and tridents and Macron and chosen opponent opt for a fencing duel.

Oreo Wed 04-Jun-25 10:09:06

I think Starmer is talking war up as a warning to Russia that as part of Nato we are all taking defence spending very seriously and aren’t going to be sitting back and looking the other way while he gets ever more aggressive. Also, Starmer needs to put taxes up and this gives the populace the reason for big tax hikes.

Allira Wed 04-Jun-25 10:22:49

Interesting that many of these belligerent leaders, ie Putin, Netanyahu, Trump, are septuagenarians. Are they just out for self-aggrandisement in the later stages of their lives and don't care what chaos they leave behind when they depart this Earth?

nanna8 Wed 04-Jun-25 10:25:54

None of them put their own lives at risk,do they? Pity, because they might think a bit harder if they did.

Allira Wed 04-Jun-25 10:27:32

Of course not.
Playing with pieces on a chess board.

Pottering Wed 04-Jun-25 13:52:55

Gosh how awful that we are seeing war as ‘inevitable’
Can we win if we buy more bombs
One poster suggesting army as a ‘gap year’ for poor kids - yes put a gun in their hand for career training- this sounds like 1914 narratives - not sure I’m suited to this group

woodenspoon Wed 04-Jun-25 13:55:01

Let’s not forget Biden in all this. Are we seriously more in danger with Trump at the helm than Biden? Who cares more about the UK? Certainly not the Democrats in the US.

Casdon Wed 04-Jun-25 13:59:21

woodenspoon

Let’s not forget Biden in all this. Are we seriously more in danger with Trump at the helm than Biden? Who cares more about the UK? Certainly not the Democrats in the US.

Of course we are in more danger with Trump at the helm, not only is he a maverick, but his team are largely clueless. The Democrats at least took a world view and understood the importance of the position of the USA in the world order.

Wyllow3 Wed 04-Jun-25 14:13:23

Pottering

Gosh how awful that we are seeing war as ‘inevitable’
Can we win if we buy more bombs
One poster suggesting army as a ‘gap year’ for poor kids - yes put a gun in their hand for career training- this sounds like 1914 narratives - not sure I’m suited to this group

I wouldn't support it - no way if I felt thats what the "one year" was all about.

Boots on the ground is a small part of defence now. Learning the basics of discipline, of team work, of work relative to peacekeeping/rescue, for the those entrants with more qualifications who'd enter the army at a different again a huge range of things to learn not the one man/women and one gun?

I wish we didn't have to take this road I hate guns drones and all that goes with but we have to defend outselves.

woodenspoon Wed 04-Jun-25 14:15:46

Casdon

woodenspoon

Let’s not forget Biden in all this. Are we seriously more in danger with Trump at the helm than Biden? Who cares more about the UK? Certainly not the Democrats in the US.

Of course we are in more danger with Trump at the helm, not only is he a maverick, but his team are largely clueless. The Democrats at least took a world view and understood the importance of the position of the USA in the world order.

In your view perhaps. Others would t agree with you.

CariadAgain Wed 04-Jun-25 14:28:31

Sarnia

I don't feel we are on a war footing but with the world as it is the Government need to increase spending to improve our defence.
As seen with the wars going on at the moment, drones and modern technology will play a big part in any future conflict.
My Dad always said that scrapping conscription was a bad idea. Young people in this country will need to be trained and ready if and when war affects us.

I guess there's going to be all sorts of viewpoints on that one. My father was in the Armed Forces for years - until a determined teenage daughter got him out of them one way or another (ahem.....). After all that - he basically turned rather anti-war on the one hand (ie he didnt feel it solved anything in the event) and his other comment was "It doesn't feel like MY country anymore - I wouldnt fight for it any longer - and I wouldnt expect many of us would" was about the gist of it.

So - nope he didnt believe in conscription. He believed in voluntary on the one hand or semi-voluntary (ie apparently voluntary - but, as he put it when I asked him why he'd gone into them "What else could a lad from a large poor family do?" (sighs....).

My erstwhile brother sorta voluntarily went into the Armed Forces at one point - but it was "sorta" voluntary - because he became a driver in one of them and being a driver was about all he was capable of doing (ie down to having a very low IQ).

For myself - I was only too glad they didn't have any form of conscription - as my mind was working around how I'd have avoided that if they ever came up with that idea....as they wouldnt have got me within a million miles of being in the Armed Forces even temporarily....

For myself personally and many in my generation - I'm really not sure just how well we could handle a war - as we turned adult in the optimistic/things are going to get better times of the 1960s/1970s and the mid-1980s onwards of things getting steadily worse and worse has created one heck of a lot of stress watching our Society getting steadily worse and trying to protect ourselves from the fallout - so I'm really not at all sure how things would work out if they went "We've done Death of a Thousand Cuts on you from the 1980s onwards, financial crash of 2008, Lockdown of 2000 for a while etc etc - and now we're going for the Big One of another war".

CariadAgain Wed 04-Jun-25 14:31:09

Whoops - "Lockdown of 2020" amendment. Nuisance not being able to amend typing errors on this forum....