User142374
sweetpotatopie
The problem with all of this, in my opinion, is that all we can get from any estranged adult child or estranged parent is their take on it.
That includes what they truly believe and also possibly only what they want to claim. But it usually seem pretty obvious that person the speaker is estranged from would be saying something different.
I really wish it was possible to hear both sides of an estranged child- adult estranged child pair. Then we might get somewhere!You are completely correct that my estranged parent (and many others) would be saying something completely different, but that doesn't prove the point you're trying to make.
If you asked me about my childhood, I would list extensive cases of non-stop abuse and neglect. If you asked my estranged parent, they would have severe selective memory and excuses that would paint her in the best possible positive light.
What you need to ask is not what the other party would be saying, but which party has more to gain from lying (and one side IS lying because both sides have polar opposite realities).
Does a child really gain more from becoming an orphan than a (supposed) abuser hiding their failures, misdeeds and crimes?
You decide.
I'm not trying to prove any point at all, User142374. And I am not asking the question you are turning my post into.
I meant what I said, which is that I think it would be more valuable to hear both sides of actual estranged parent-child pairs than only hearing from unattached individuals.
I am an estranged adult child, by the way.
