mum2three
George Floyd was a criminal and was in police custody. Henry Nowak was a victim but treated like a criminal. There is the difference.
George Floyd was not a habitual criminal. As a young man he had been convicted and imprisoned for the crimes he committed, but after his release in 2013 he went straight and reformed. He was active in his church community and had committed no crimes since his release from prison. He died in 2020 after 7 years of exemplary behaviour.
He was living in another part of the USA from where he had committed his crimes, so it was unlikely that the Mineapolis police had any knowledge of him at all. He was being followed and arrested by the police because a shop assistant reported him as having bought some goods with a forged bank note. The police did not know whether he was aware the bank note was forged, Given his behaviour after he came out prison, he may well not have.
Lets face it can anyone on GN say with absolute confidence that if they were given a forged banknote, no matter how good it was, they would always recognise it? I was given a forged £1, a very poor one, about a month ago I did not notice and tried to use it to pay for goods, but the shop assistant recognised it as forged, and so did I when I actually looked at it.
On the basis of being suspected of passing a forged bank note. He was chased by the police and deliberately murdered y them. There was a trial and one of the police was convicted and is now serving a prison sentence.
Henry Nowak had no criminal history and was murdered by the man who has now been convicted. But both crimes were motivated by institutional racism in the USA and UK.
George Flood died because of the prejudice against people of colour that runs through out the police and justice system in the USA and because police forces in the US are far more brutal and so much more racist when faced with people of colour.
Henry Nowak died because of the racism in this country and the belief, again institutionalised, that there is no worse crime than saying something racist. Once his assailant said he had shouted racial insults Henry Nowaks fate was sealed.
The police took no notice of any thing he said. They immediately decided without investigation that, as his assailant was not white English, anything he said should be accepted as true and the white man on the floor's claims of being stabbed could be ignored.
The two cases seem remarkably similar to me.