Does anyone else remember the story about a boy who wore a skirt to school as a protest because although girls were allowed to choose to wear skirts over bare legs in hot weather, boys weren't allowed to wear short trousers? There was no rule, quite rightly imo, that boys couldn't wear skirts.
And then there was a similar protest in Norway or Sweden where train drivers wore skirts in hot weather for the same reason.
Girls can wear 'boyish' clothes in pretty much all circumstances nowadays but the reaction to this boy's preferences shows that we don't extend the same freedom to boys. I ask why not?
I daresay similar arguments were put forward when women first started wearing trousers for practical reasons as are being put forward about boys wearing dresses. Why should wearing a dress when you are five matter when you are a grown up? Why should males wearing dresses matter at all?
Why shouldn't a boy wear a dress to playgroup one day a week? Why should he limit his dress-wearing to at home? Sorry, but I don't see a good reason; I only see prejudice.
As for the publicity now mattering when he's an adult, it's possible, but it's also possible that it won't matter in the least. By then he might just laugh about it (if he even remembers) or he might have decided he's a woman.
100 dresses is certainly a lot. I expect the queen and a good number of celebs have more and that very few people mind.
I guess in the end I find the judgmental negativity on this thread the most disturbing thing.
Angela Rayner is a scrounger, grifter and shameless hypocrite.
What's one health habit you've started that's actually made a difference?




the light has dawned 