Gransnet forums

Chat

How did this work you?

(27 Posts)
Nelliemoser Thu 31-Mar-16 16:19:53

Netmums.com
Yesterday at 12:14 ·

Is this true for you?
netmu.ms/GenderChart

Nelliemoser Thu 31-Mar-16 16:21:37

This proved correct for me and my parents but is it reliable?

janeainsworth Thu 31-Mar-16 16:24:23

Yes 100% shock (3 DCs)

Ana Thu 31-Mar-16 16:25:02

Not correct for me or DD.

Anniebach Thu 31-Mar-16 16:31:11

No,

Elegran Thu 31-Mar-16 16:32:55

Well, it has a 50% chance of being right, but what about twins of mixed sex, conceived at exactly the same time, when their mother was exactly the same age?

Nelliemoser Thu 31-Mar-16 16:33:50

It was for my daughter. It is probably one of those effects of people taking particular notice of a possible coincidence.

Let's watch and wait to see what happens.

Synonymous Thu 31-Mar-16 16:34:49

No

Anniebach Thu 31-Mar-16 16:36:32

Seems I had two sons, best tell my two daughters they are chaps

Elegran Thu 31-Mar-16 16:38:17

I would say it is the placebo effect - people remember when it is correct, but if it is wrong they assume that on this occasion it is "the exception that proves the rule"

What about leap year? The end of one month and the beginning of another would be on different days in different years. It couldn't be correct for both eventualities.

ginny Thu 31-Mar-16 16:38:40

It seems two of my 3 girls should have been boys. So have to think it is a load of rubbish.

shysal Thu 31-Mar-16 16:53:37

I have 2 daughters, but one would have been a boy according to this.

Marmight Thu 31-Mar-16 16:54:15

All 3 correct

Maggiemaybe Thu 31-Mar-16 16:57:26

It's just a bit of fun, surely, but I was surprised to find it worked for my three children and my three grandsons. Then I tried it on the dates for my parents (my sister and I) and it was right again. Then I tried my sister's dates for her two daughters, and it worked. Then I tried my niece's dates for her three children, and it worked again. Which just goes to prove two things - that I have far too much time on my hands and that I am looking for anything to put off doing the jobs that need doing round the house.

Ana Thu 31-Mar-16 17:02:46

But Maggie, how can you be sure of the conception dates for so many? Just counting backwards 9 months isn't always correct.

Maggiemaybe Thu 31-Mar-16 18:08:48

I don't know the dates for any of them, Ana, even my own grin I just went with 9 months. It's a load of baloney anyway (and I still haven't done any of those jobs....)
If I was hoping for a boy or girl though, back in the day, I might have used this as well as the other silly things that have been recommended over the years - certain diets, hmm positions blush etc. No harm in it, I suppose.

hildajenniJ Thu 31-Mar-16 19:00:20

For me there was one right, one wrong. DD has one girl and three boys. According to the chart she should have three girls and one boy! confused

tanith Thu 31-Mar-16 19:09:08

All 3 of my children correct confused

Indinana Thu 31-Mar-16 19:13:17

It was wrong for my DS but right for my DD (hmm, law of averages grin). My parents had 4 of us, only one of which it was true for!

But as has already been pointed out, I don't really know the conception dates of my siblings and me. For all I know we were very early/late and had actually been conceived in a different month than I calculated.

Greyduster Thu 31-Mar-16 19:37:04

It was correct for my first - I knew the date of his conception. I didn't for my daughter so I couldn't test it.

annodomini Thu 31-Mar-16 20:34:08

Accurate for both of mine. I can't speak for the GC because they all overshot their due delivery dates.

Envious Thu 31-Mar-16 20:42:28

Yes for me

Penstemmon Thu 31-Mar-16 20:45:39

50% for me and my DDs! So no, seems like chance!

Jalima Thu 31-Mar-16 21:02:51

DD1 always says she has more balls than some men grin

Bellanonna Thu 31-Mar-16 21:45:15

Correct for both