Gransnet forums

News & politics

Hundreds of illegal migrants to be put in existing military barracks

(109 Posts)
Primrose53 Thu 25-Jun-26 22:46:56

Linton on Ouse, Yorkshire

Barnham, Suffolk

Bicester, Oxfordshire

Plus they are planning to expand other barracks.

All young men who we know nothing about.

Wyllow3 Thu 25-Jun-26 22:58:15

Quite a good video from Sky (1 min 34 secs) Listen to the boundaries carefully. (ie time spent there, reality check on expectations of migrants etc)

news.sky.com/video/inside-the-former-army-barracks-in-crowborough-used-to-house-asylum-seekers-13497619

LemonJam Thu 25-Jun-26 23:05:17

Thanks for the explanatory link Wyllow3.

If not housed in former army barracks as outlined- I wonder where the OP and others would prefer asylum seekers to be housed whilst awaiting their asylum applications to be processed.

Wyllow3 Thu 25-Jun-26 23:14:41

Well exactly. They also allude to the deterrent affect. Which actually matches measures taken in other European countries.
Labour have actually been doing a lot to try and change matter: it frustrates me this isn't recognised, because despite policy claims from the Far right claims "turn the boats back" they know quite well they cant do it.

Well unless you want everyone to be drowned when France refuses to take them back - and why should they? (goes away muttering, reminding GN's that around 94% of incomers come legally and the govt are taking more action on both these matters than previous ones. And actually speeding up the processing.

Maremia Fri 26-Jun-26 06:22:19

Labour will not be given credit for improvements in many MSM outlets.

MartavTaurus Fri 26-Jun-26 06:36:00

I guess it's a short term solution, but not the answer to the problem.
Add these young male illegal migrants to the 6,000 killers, rapists and sex offenders being freed early from prison from September, and we have a tinderbox waiting to ignite.

Just because we move the problem round the houses, it doesn't go away and certainly serves as no deterrent.

Calendargirl Fri 26-Jun-26 06:39:34

The military barracks didn’t seem to be a solution under the Tories, which is why hotels were used.

Why will it work now?

GrannyGravy13 Fri 26-Jun-26 06:39:57

Better than hotels or HMO’s in town centres.

Aveline Fri 26-Jun-26 06:54:05

Seems a sensible option

MartavTaurus Fri 26-Jun-26 07:16:49

GrannyGravy13

Better than hotels or HMO’s in town centres.

Yes.

Toula Fri 26-Jun-26 07:22:37

Also moving them to massive Army base in Grantham. Personally, I cannot understand why we allow undocumented, unvaccinated, uneducated, unskilled, non-English speaking, different cultured, etc, who throw away any ID upon landing on British or other European shores. Just considering where I would go and live given the same circumstances. Monaco, perhaps.

Maremia Fri 26-Jun-26 07:28:58

Can you suggest a way to 'un-allow' them?
Is there a way?
We had a deal with France until BREXIT.

GrannyGravy13 Fri 26-Jun-26 07:35:28

Maremia

Can you suggest a way to 'un-allow' them?
Is there a way?
We had a deal with France until BREXIT.

I just Google the Dublin Agreement, which we were part of before we left the EU.

We (UK) received more migrants than we removed under this..

MaizieD Fri 26-Jun-26 08:06:49

Well unless you want everyone to be drowned when France refuses to take them back - and why should they? (goes away muttering, reminding GN's that around 94% of incomers come legally and the govt are taking more action on both these matters than previous ones. And actually speeding up the processing.

I think that drowning is the preferred solution, Wyllow. That, or a mass abduction by aliens to take them to a galaxy far far away. They certainly don’t seem to be considered fit to exist on the same planet as the British…

GrannyGravy13 Fri 26-Jun-26 08:17:16

MaizieD what a horrible insinuation!

It is not a crime to be concerned about these (mainly) young men arriving on our shores with no documentation.

I am going to assume that your last paragraph was an attempt at either irony or sarcasm…

Wyllow3 Fri 26-Jun-26 08:31:04

Think Private Eye? Reductio ad Absurdum?

GrannyGravy13 Fri 26-Jun-26 08:34:47

Wyllow3

Think Private Eye? Reductio ad Absurdum?

Careful a former PM was castigated for sprinkling his speeches with Latin…

MaizieD Fri 26-Jun-26 09:07:20

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.

Oreo Fri 26-Jun-26 09:11:59

GrannyGravy13

Wyllow3

Think Private Eye? Reductio ad Absurdum?

Careful a former PM was castigated for sprinkling his speeches with Latin…

😂
Oooh yes, much too elitist.

Wyllow3 Fri 26-Jun-26 09:13:29

GrannyGravy13

Wyllow3

Think Private Eye? Reductio ad Absurdum?

Careful a former PM was castigated for sprinkling his speeches with Latin…

Aw, I did enjoy it GG13 grin

I also had to look it up. 2x grin

(It was floating round my mind as a neat summary)

JenniferEccles Fri 26-Jun-26 09:15:11

Rwanda? It was never given a chance to see if it would indeed act as a deterrent as the foolish Starmer abandoned the whole idea.

It may have worked or it may not but it should at least have been given a chance.

I believe it had already been showing encouraging signs.

GrannyGravy13 Fri 26-Jun-26 09:16:53

If you had read my earlier post MaizieD you would know that I am in favour of Barracks being utilised in this way 🤦‍♀️

AGAA4 Fri 26-Jun-26 09:17:48

The military barracks are the best option. Housing in hotels was a bad idea. At least Labour are actually addressing the problem in a constructive way.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Fri 26-Jun-26 09:22:36

Not all cases of migrants landing here are genuine asylum seekers. If they were there’d be no need for Tik Tok guides and coaches telling them to ‘pretend they’re gay’ to game the system. We are too soft.

Oreo Fri 26-Jun-26 09:23:06

GrannyGravy13

If you had read my earlier post MaizieD you would know that I am in favour of Barracks being utilised in this way 🤦‍♀️

Me too, it’s the obvious answer to migrant housing.
MaizieD I consider your comments disgraceful to other GN members and absolutely untrue.