DiamondLily
There's "in the public interest" and then there's just click-bait stuff with our press. They use everything as "in the public interest".
If a politician is dodgy, lying or corrupt, then of course it's public interest.
If a royal is receiving carrier bags containing £3 million in cash, then, yes, that's public interest.
If a royal is being connected with trafficking/grooming/exploitation of young girls, then thats public interest.
Who is having a relationship with whom is not public interest. It's personal.
There are reams of stuff, online, about William having a female "side interest" in Norfolk - is that our business? No, it's not.
The press try to excuse their behaviour with their cry of "public interest", and it's often ludicrous.
Well said!
Click-bait is ultimately advertising revenue. And there's no lack of interest in the intimate lives of royalty - it's insatiable - ker-ching!
Without wanting to virtue-signal, I refuse to read the gossip about William and have no idea whether it's true or not. It must be hurtful for his wife. Will his eldest child also at some point read about it? I'm not a fan of royalty anyway, they are still human beings with feelings though.