Still no sign of acknowledgement just more justifying rhetoric.
Precisely that trisher but still you carry on like a stuck record.
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Diane Abbott quits the shadow cabinet.
(334 Posts)She’s stepping down, no matter who is selected as the next leader of the Labour Party.
I think it’s a vote catcher quite honestly.
Do you think she could have been PM if she hadn 't hitched her wagon to Jeremy Corbyn?
She did try standing for the leadership but couldn’t get the number needed to stand.
I'd forgotten that
Callistemon I wouldn't have thought so. There are too many factors working against her. To even imagine the LP would manage to elect a black woman as leader is sadly still an impossibility. Sexism and racism are still evident in some male MPs on all sides. I was shocked when I looked at how many women black and asian MPs there have been. There are more now than ever before but it is only in the last 10-15 years that numbers have increased. It's a sad reflection of our society in general.
To some extent, I think you're right trisher; there is still an ingrained mysoginy, particularly on some of these threads. A good example of this was this post:
I can't help noting that there is often a sharp contrast between the prettiness of a name (like Priti Patel) and the nastiness of the views.
So using the ethnic origin name of PP was obviously seen as fair game.
That's shocking, was it on this thread?
I just thought that was a bit of a weak pun Chewbacca. Is it racist to make puns of Asian names? Or misogynistic to make puns of a woman's name? Are we only permitted to make puns of white male names? Or is that misandry?
You’d say it was racism Trisher.
A "weak pun" trisher? But this whole discussion revolves around how women, and particularly women of colour, are discussed and portrayed by us and the media. It's generally acknowledged that making reference to any aspect that marks those women as "other", such as their appearance, their colour or anything that confirms their ethnicity, is to be condemned. That's because it's racist. And it's still racist whether it's Priti Patel or Diane Abbott. The only difference is that one is in the Labour Party and the other is a Tory.
It's double standards trisher.
trisher
'And do you never ever worry that your views are influenced by the racism that surrounds you? And having a black or Asian friend doesn't stop you being racist.'
----
No I do not worry my views are influenced by the racism that surrounds me because I am not a racist, do not hold racist opinions.---
' And I will say Priti Patel has done well to be made Home Secretary but if I were her I would always be wondering if my appointment was in some way the Conservatives showing Labour "Anything you can do" and if DA going will mean she gets shuffled out?'
Well trisher going by your twisted logic what would you say if Rebecca Long Bailey or Lisa Nandy became Prime Minister at the next election and somebody said:-
And I will say Rebecca Long Bailey/Lisa Nandy has done well to be made Prime Minister but if I were her I would always be wondering if my appointment was in some way the Labour Party showing the Conservative Party "Anything you can do". and if Boris Johnsons going will mean she gets shuffled out because she was only kept in to show after 2 Conservative Female Prime Ministers we just wanted to show we can do it to.
And you use the word ' misogyny' to attack others.
POGS It isn't racist to consider why someone else behaves as they do. It is simply the result of having an enquiring mind. Of course if you simply go around saying "I'm not racist" "That's not racist" then you will not understand examining everyone's motives carefully (and yes, I do examine my own. I have considered very carefully my views on Priti Patel and if it is racist to make jokes about her name)
As for the idea you suggested about the Labour leadership I do think there will be many MPs swallowing down mysogynistic feelings and voting for a woman because they think the LP should keep up with the Tories.
But you really should learn to draw a distinction between examining motives and suggesting reasons and holding those views yourself. In fact the less you examine and the more you state constantly that there isn't racism and you aren't racist the more likely you are to be unconsciously racist.
But you really should learn to draw a distinction between examining motives and suggesting reasons and holding those views yourself. In fact the less you examine and the more you state constantly that there isn't racism and you aren't racist the more likely you are to be unconsciously racist.
Right back at ya trisher.
I think if you are White British and " older" you will be unconsciously racist.
The best we can do is to be open minded and thoughtful and have empathy for our fellow human beings.
Greymar, I couldn't agree more! It isn't until you've lived it that you understand. So non-white family members coming home and relating the discrimination they face, the hardships put in their way. SEEING people treat them differently. I've even had white people make racist comments, thinking as an older, white woman that I'm sure to share their point of view, not knowing my family background.
And lets face it, there is a LOT of racism on this forum and there are almost certainly racist Private Messages shooting back and forth between some members. Pity GNHQ don't monitor those too.
Oh yes indeed Gaga. Some of the worst offenders I have found are trades people who casually assume I will share their ghastly views. One guy told me indignantly he had been asked to remove his shoes before working in a house. He put this down to the fact that they are Muslamics and was clearly waiting for me to tut and join in. He must have been gutted when I ended the exchange.
Chewbacca are you trying to say I should look at my own opinions? If not why not say so? I do try to. I also try to listen to others who have more experience. For example I used to quite disapprove of the hijab but I listened to two Muslim women who perform as The Hijab Sisters and I realised that for some women it is empowering. It's only when we keep insisting we are not and cannot possibly be racist that we slip into becoming so.
What you look for, you will usually find.
There are none so blind as them that will not see.
trisher, 10 years ago I was working in a regular British state school in Northumberland. I had ONE Muslim student in my class (11 years old) who made the choice NOT to wear any kind of head covering.
When it was time for the class to do speaking presentations, she was nearly the last. She did a talk about her sister who had decided she would wear a headscarf. She described the abuse that her sister had hurled at her on a daily basis, JUST because she wore a headscarf. She described how they couldn't even walk down to the local shop without abuse.
The rest of the class were regular white British kids. Usual variety of attitudes, from not bothered/accepting, down to downright racist.
When the Muslim girl stopped speaking, without exception, the whole class applauded. I was at the back of the room (had to go there to hide because her descriptions were bringing tears to my eyes) and was full on weeping at the classes applause.
A pity some on here weren't a bit more able to empathise with the difficult racist experiences that some others have, instead of trying to blame those who point unacceptable attitudes out.
I've still got her book with her speech written in it. She's grown up and at university now. Still not wearing a headscarf. Her choice.
ananimous and if you don't look it may still be there just unacknowledged.
Gagajo Well done that girl. I must say I was surprised about how the Hijab sisters spoke about the abuse they received and how they wore it because they chose to.
And youre still missing the point! You're justifiably outraged at the racial abuse that has been directed at Diane Abbott over her political career. But you will not acknowledge that Priti Patel has been subjected to the very same racial abuse; in the media and right here on GN. Holding her name up for ridicule is just one example. But you gloss over it and resort to whataboutery because she's not a political figure that you happen to support.
And yes trisher, I did mean exactly that in my earlier post.
“It ain't what they call you, it's what you answer to.”
― W.C. Fields
Disgraceful behaviour on this thread from people obsessed.
Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »
