Gransnet forums

Chat

Iis it unnatural to love your partner MORE than your children.

(145 Posts)
paddyann Sun 06-May-18 20:33:03

Saw this on MN and was amazed at some of the replies .Apparently it is unnatural to love your OH more than your children.When I got married my mum told me to always make sure my husband came first ove rthe kids except when they wer sick or in need ..obviously .I think I kind of did that ,we have a brilliant relationship with our AD but our own relationship is still strong and the romance intact after 43 years .As mum said your kids grow up and move on and you still have a life together so make that a priority.I think she got it spot on.What do gransnetters think?Was my mum right or are th mumsnetters ?

Maggiemaybe Mon 07-May-18 09:12:45

And if your child's fit and well and 42 and your partner's disabled?

I think what most of us are saying, BlueBelle, is that we love all our family equally, but give priority to the one who needs our love and care the most at any given time. In that family, nobody's second best. Love is not finite, and every new member of the family brings their own love with them.

Fennel Mon 07-May-18 09:18:56

"I agree with Elegran there are different kinds of love" - that's my view too.
I think the love for our children is the strongest, because it includes a protective instinct, often a parent will give up their life for a child. Maybe a way of keeping the human race going.
Would you give up your life for your husband , or wife?

trisher Mon 07-May-18 09:30:39

I can't really comment I split with my ex years ago, so the children have come first for years. One thing I would ask, how do those of you who love their DH/DP best relate to their daughters? I only realised as I grew older that my mum regarded me as a rival and did her very best to ensure I didn't get too close to my dad. They were very young when they married and had children, so I do understand, but regret that I let her manipulate me so much and didn't appreciate what was going on at the time. I wonder if this is a problem others have struggled with?

Granny23 Mon 07-May-18 09:45:42

Now that the 'Who to save in a fire' or 'who to put in the life boat' scenarios have been raised, I find that I can answer them immediately. Our 3 DGC are 9, 10 and 11, no longer babies but with their whole lives before them. Therefore they come first, DDs next, then SILs. As for DH, he cannot function without my constant care, so either we both survive or we die together.

TerriBull Mon 07-May-18 09:51:53

As others have said it's a different kind of love. Having said that I think it was always important to us to make time for each other right from the start and that still stands. When our children were very young we had them in a regular routine, bath story, bedtime and that was it, the evening was ours. I knew plenty of other people who allowed their children to rule their lives at that age, constant bed hopping, always sleeping in their parents' beds, we didn't have that unless they were ill. My husband had two children already, late teens, when we got together so his knowledge of parenting was already in place, I was a complete novice and hadn't really spent time around young children. Parenting has different stages, some more difficult than others, teen years with one of ours would be a period I wouldn't choose to repeat. Inevitably, children do occupy your time and thoughts whatever age they are and like most, I never stop worrying about them. When they are young it is easy to lose sight of the need for adult time, because being a parent can be all consuming.

I often have lunch with a friend who never does anything "together" with her husband, holidays, meals out, cinema, absolutely nothing, not because of a lack of money either. Right from the start they always made their only child their raison d'etre, so if they go out for a birthday meal, she comes too, similarly they will go away for a few days together it will never be the two of them. She's in her late 20s now, so I'm thinking from her point of view tagging along with one parent or another isn't good for her. I'm also struck by how many times my friend will text her during our lunch out meet ups, given she will be picking her up at their local station later after her daughter's daily commute to work, having driven her to the station in the morning. It's like she's still at school hmm

Flowerofthewest Mon 07-May-18 09:54:06

Surely you cannot 'choose' to love one more than the other. Love is an emotion. It flows naturally.

fran1311 Mon 07-May-18 10:02:50

I think the love you have for your children is a different type of love to the one you have for your husband.
Sometimes when we have our babies we are so taken up with caring and protecting the baby that husband sometimes feels neglected. Yes, caring for children and doing housework and cooking is tiring but a kiss and a cuddle would make him and hopefully you feel so much better.

Kathcan1 Mon 07-May-18 10:04:11

As long as love is unconditional that’s what really matters, children, mothers,: friends and husbands, all important to us. The trick is to make everyone of them feel special to you. Your lucky to have a good marriage and it’s working for you. I do hope though that gone are the days where the man sits at the head of the table and rules over all, demanding your attention above all others.

TwiceAsNice Mon 07-May-18 10:04:26

There isn't a man alive I would put before my children. Your children are part of you physically and emotionally forever. I loved all my children instantly with my whole being when one of them died I left something of myself behind never to be recovered. My husband was very different and ended very badly I don't miss him at all my life is better without him

BRedhead59 Mon 07-May-18 10:09:44

I think it changes over time:- Partner - baby - children - and partner again. I also think your brain does it for you no need for advice.

Anniebach Mon 07-May-18 10:10:22

Love isn’t a choice, I didn’t choose to love my husband , and I didn’t give thought to -I must be my own rock, I just loved him .

When our first child was born I was quite shaken by my feelings for her, it was overwhelming, this wasn’t a choice.

holdingontometeeth Mon 07-May-18 10:11:52

Completely different kinds of love.
When my children were born, and indeed my grandchildren, the love that gushed out of my heart made me feel that it would pop out of my body.
Love for your partner comes nowhere near in that particular intensity.

Peaseblossom Mon 07-May-18 10:12:16

I’m sorry, but as soon as I had my first baby I knew that I could never love my husband as much as any of my children, and after three children that feeling remained. If had to choose, my children would come first.

Theoddbird Mon 07-May-18 10:20:54

You cannot chose to love one person more than another....We don't control this emotion. We can't even love our children equally....

Coconut Mon 07-May-18 10:22:48

Of course it’s a different kind of love, but in my experience the instant and overwhelming love for my 3 children far outweighed anything else I have ever felt in my entire life. Altho I am very lucky now in my life, I have never been lucky enough to ever meet my Mr Right, just a couple of Mr Wrongs ! My 2nd husband constantly tried to make me choose between my kids or him .... he was on a losing streak just for putting me in that position, as if it was a game for his ego, totally disrespecting the bond I had as a mother. I told him this, but when his company collapsed and he hit the bottle, his behaviour worsened ... I divorced him for mental cruelty.

mischief Mon 07-May-18 10:23:45

I have obviously got this wrong. After my first child was born my husband asked me who I would save, if the house was on fire, him or the baby. I said the baby without hesitation. Maybe that explains why the relationship didn't last. I still put my children first but I'm happy on own.

ajanela Mon 07-May-18 10:23:57

For those that have difficult relationships this is a non started especially if they have left or want to.

Grampie Mon 07-May-18 10:29:59

Love is love.

It is not “more” or “less”.

I’ve never understood “I love you very much”. It’s as if our love should be metered out.

Craicon Mon 07-May-18 10:38:49

I think that children should always come first regardless. I love my DH but I’d survive just fine without him and vice-versa. I value my independence and don’t like the idea of a co-dependency type partnership, although I can see it with some of my friends who will clearly struggle when one of the partners dies first.

annan Mon 07-May-18 10:39:36

Pray you are never asked to choose. It happened to me when my DH asked his step daughter to stop using our home as hers aged 19 and she could not come home for uni holidays. Broke my heart. Cried for two years. Fortunately rifts healed now but I still feel awful I let my daughter down.

EthelJ Mon 07-May-18 10:44:50

I agree there are different kinds of love and you can't quantify it, but I would always put the needs of my children (and grandchildren)first . Regarding Bluebelle's question I would rescue my child first without question.

Yellowmellow Mon 07-May-18 10:45:12

I'm another one that doesn't understand this. Surely you love your children differently to how you love your partner, to how you love your parents etc etc etc.
Got to say loving my children and grandchildren is unconditional love. Partner, as my ex husband found to his cost.....was not the case!

Crazygrandma2 Mon 07-May-18 10:45:22

paddyann that's what my mom told me, though she didn't always put it into practice as Dad used to say he came after us, the GC, the dog and the cats! smile

I think SueDonim, Maggiemaybe and Elegran have expressed my thoughts for me - thank you ladies.

There is more than enough love to go around and it's all about who needs what and when. I must have done something right along the way as still with DH after 48yrs and we both also have a great relationship with the AC, who for whatever reason seem to enjoy our company, if only to laugh at us sometimes smile

rafichagran Mon 07-May-18 10:49:33

Why on earth did you agree to that Annan? Why did and cry, you should have put your foot down and said it's her home as well.
In this incidence I would have stood my ground with him. 'Rifts have now been healed', it should not have happened in the first place.

EthelJ Mon 07-May-18 11:03:04

I agree with the point about unconditional love. There is nothing my children or grandchildren could do that would make me stop loving them. I may dislike something they do or disapprove but I could never stop loving them . I can't say the same about anyone else.