North Devon expectant mothers are on their own as of today.
Gransnet forums
Chat
BREXIT? Am I just plain stupid?
(419 Posts)I am 64 years old, voted to stay in EU but we were outvoted.
I have no IDEA what all the talks on Brexit actually mean? OK...readily admit I am not the brightest (political) spark in the box but when I hear discussions, I have absolutely no idea what they are going on about? Do I just tune out somehow? Could I make any sense if I paid more attention?
What the heck does it all mean?
Any pointers would be most and truly appreciated. Help this old foggie understand what is going on Aaaarahhhhh
I was brought up to be honest and tell the truth. So I can't understand [and I never will] the total acceptance by leave voters with regards the promise to give that money to the NHS. It makes me think of things my daughter said as she was growing up; again, having been brought up to be honest and decent, whenever she was in a situation where another child had behaved badly she would sadly say 'mum, why did they do that, it's wrong, isn't it'. To which, I didn't really have an answer
.
Here's an excellent article by Michael White, pulling everything together., and answering that question lots of times, Tegan.
www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/michael-white-road-nowhere-1-5292681
I believe most people voted on single issues or emotional ones. The Daily Mail et al fed their readers with their Brexit led ideas and the less informed swallowed them. (Don’t even get me on that idiot Johnson). When I heard the result I was horrified. All I could think of was that we had as a country got through wars, depressions and all sorts but this was the first time we had actually set out to harm ourselves. I was also upset that we were told that the old people were to blame! Their memories obviously didn’t include the UK being referred to as “the poor man of Europe”. It is tragic that our grandchildren will suffer as a result of their decision.
It has always amazed me how little the average Brit knows about their own history. They seem to think it all started with the second WW which, of course, we 'won'. This is the nation that was happy to invade other countries, impose their own rules and build an empire. Somebody said the motto of the Brits was ”grab, smash and brag”. But when EU immigrants arrive on our shore to WORK we complain we ”are being controlled by the EU.” If you think education is unnecessary try ignorance and see where it gets you.
This is the nation that was happy to invade other countries, impose their own rules and build an empire
Like the Dutch, French, Germans, Spanish ....... Empires were all the rage at one point in history, but I don't think people should be judged on what happened before they were born.
Maybe one way of looking at the EU is comparing it to an old-school empire, where countries take turns in leading it. A sort of virtual empire.
You are so right Greta - very few seem to know about anything. I have been coming to the conclusion lately that although I went to the normal State schools directly after the war I must have had really good teachers! I hated missing a day.
The Grammar school was staffed by graduate teachers many of whom had at some point done military service. We had great history lessons without any films etc to back up our books. When something big was happening in the world we talked about it - Suez being one topic I remember well. For O level I did English and European history from 1832-1914 - a very colourful and interesting time when the foundations of much of today's democracy was laid down and employment laws started to be formed. Wouldn't it have been marvellous to watch Gladstone, Disraeli, Peel etc at work in Parliament. I always thought Walpole must have been a fair chap to have on your side - he did the job of Prime Minister but almost didn't like the use of the title - you only need to see the wording on the door of number 10 to see that.
The EU countries see the UK as good law makers - most of the EU laws were written by the UK but now we want to have nothing to do with them.
However they protest it is a lot of ignorance on the part of some of the electorate which caused this mess - not necessarily their fault but maybe the education system and having teachers who were not so well informed.
Of course, Primrose, you are right. The Brits were not the only ones and certainly we should not judge people on the basis of the past. But, should we not inform them about that past?
I was a secondary school teacher for many years and was sometimes shocked how little the younger generation of teachers knew about their own subject. A teacher of English once gave me a report on a pupil. The report said...”XX should listen to what his teachers advice him to do”. I corrected 'advice'. The teacher came back to me very cross and demanded to know why I had corrected it saying ”I looked it up in the dictionary and that is how you spell it!” The irony is that I am an EU national and English is my second language.
Greta It usually takes someone who speaks English as a second (or third) language to highlight how limited our grasp of English is. 
I couldn't agree more about learning relevant history. I didn't enjoy history lessons at school - the delights of medieval farming methods were quite lost on me. It may be interesting from an academic perspective but unlikely to engage teenagers.
I think we have to be careful about how we look at our empire building. We certainly weren't the only country ever to have done it and, until very recent times, extending your territory was seen as a 'good thing' by any country that could do it. Those who managed to achieve it were lauded by their own country and admired by others.
We may not have handled the changes back to the sovereignty of individual countries well but did other empire builders, France, Russia, etc.
Understanding history is not helped if we try to re-write it in the process.
I believe that British history should be thoroughly taught in schools both the good and the bad parts of our past. We cannot change anything that occurred during our "empire days" but younger generations should know and have a right to be aware of how this nation changed the world at the peek of its global and industrial powers. To that younger generation much of the forgoing would not make for good reading, but as stated they have a right to that knowledge and in that be given the opportunity to learn
In one area of our history I believe we all have reason to be extremely proud. Following the second world war Britain was being written off as the sick declining nation of Europe and the world. However, Britain proved that wrong by transforming itself under a range of governments of different colours from a declining empire nation into one of the top ten commercial and economic powers of the globe. That to should also be taught to our younger generation as it was all achieved peacefully to credit of our 65 plus years generation
Britain went from being the ‘sick man of Europe’ in the 70s to a successful country AFTER joining the EU.
I agree about history being taught in schools particularly from about 1832 to more modern times when there was so much change going on and many dreadful laws being repealed.
That period would also cover how our current Parliamentary system gradually came into being.
well done a great comment and true thank you

It took a while for that penny to droop didn't it? 

Perhaps it was a cent and not a penny
Just noticed my penny dropped, not dropped. 
DROOPED!
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »
