Gransnet forums

Chat

Our girls

(58 Posts)
Jane10 Wed 04-Mar-15 08:21:30

I despaired once more reading about almost 400 girls sexually abused by groups of men. The police and SW have come in for criticism -quite rightly to my mind. However, these girls were aged between 12 and 15. Were they not at school? Did teachers not notice? I gather some parents tried to get help but were ignored. Would you have allowed yourself to be ignored? Easy to say but I know it must have been hellish for them. What's wrong with our families that we don't /can't seem to keep our girls safe. Its interesting that the abusers were almost all of pakistani origin. Our girls must have seemed such easy targets compared to those in their own families. No easy answers - just ranting!

AlieOxon Fri 06-Mar-15 11:30:13

Yes you are probably right.
So WHERE is the image of a good, strong man?

soontobe Fri 06-Mar-15 11:36:11

David Beckham? Though he is old hat nowadays.

soontobe Fri 06-Mar-15 11:38:04

I will put the same link on here that I put on the feminism thread earlier.
I can only find a Daily Mail link re this
www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2979456/Young-singers-models-WAGs-win-followers-women-men-sports-stars-politicans-academics.html

soontobe Fri 06-Mar-15 11:50:49

You could be right again Penstemmon.
It doesnt help at all that there are so many jobs now done by machines instead of people.

Eloethan Fri 06-Mar-15 12:20:25

I had very few restrictions placed on me when I was around 12/13. I could go round to my friends' houses, go to the cinema, even go to a rhythm and blues club for young people and get the bus home fairly late at night, go to see pop stars at the local cinema and hang around waiting for autographs (the Kinks, the Stones, etc.). I had a good time but didn't misbehave.

The culture was different then. There was only the BBC and one commercial channel which showed fairly amateurish advertisements. There wasn't 24-hour television, or the internet, or mobile phones. Life was pretty simple and young people weren't constantly bombarded with information to make them feel inadequate or envious of others.

Anya Fri 06-Mar-15 12:34:23

I used to think that paedophiles were those (mainly) men who had been convicted and jailed for the rape and murder of young boys and girls. I never occurred to me that there were 'ordinary' men, celebrities, fathers and grandfathers, priests and vicars, organised gangs and so on who fell into this category.

It was only when I was working with children that this behaviour was recognised, by myself and colleagues.

What is happening, at long last, is the hardening of attitudes which actually condemns this behaviour instead of sweeping it under the carpet. Had there been more of an awareness and less acceptance of this abuse when Savile and co were operating I doubt this latest grooming would have reached such a scale.

I'm niw wondering just what is going to be uncovered regarding MPs, Parliament and No.10 ?

Eloethan Fri 06-Mar-15 14:49:16

I do agree Anya that the image of the typical offender was of a man on the periphery of society - a weird, dirty old man in a grubby raincoat, rather than a "respectable", personable man, holding down a responsible and respected job and having children of his own. Of course, we know better now.

However, in some cases it appears that it was not so much a lack of awareness that allowed these people to offend but a lack of will on the part of some people to do anything about it. Those who did venture to express their concerns were sometimes strongly discouraged from pursuing the matter. For instance, Mrs Thatcher had apparently already been warned about Savile's behaviour and had been urged not to allow him such freedom of movement.