The great dog/cat controversy

Just going to check on Larry back in a mo

pardon the pun....Rover may have blown his own cover

have your particulars been taken down whenim

My lawyer says I must say 'no comment' to everything that is asked of me, as new information is breaking and I might have got away with it be found innocent. And anyway, it wasn't me!

It's DUNCAN!!!

who is your lawyer, when? [suspicious emoticon]

No comment!

It wasn't duncan! He's the dog! Really, nag, get your head straight.

Oh, but that was thhe question wasn't it? maybe he singed himself.

but I thought it was soop and nellie who were doing all the singing!!!!

'No comment!'

when is that your statement?

Cui bono is what we should be looking at!
Was it Donald who ran off with BBQ? Or did someone else take it to eat at home?
Who had lamb to eat that night?

No comment

bagsouch!

That sounds suspicious

Keep up, Bags! I still maintain Duncan singed his own backside while attempting to alleviate a virulent itch! Probably caught while sheep-rustling...

I have been advised to sign my statement!

Signed bollocks whenIm64

Aha! But you're not, yet, are you when? That's flagrant fraudery!

.....where's the new info then?

No comment

My statement was ripped up by an angry investigator (*Anagram*) so here is my signed statement again

Signed: Iamnearly64 (talk about pedantic!)

Unless you are prepared to reveal it in open court, it can't be taken into consideration, unless divulgence would prove a danger to the realm.[stern judicial emoticon]

Yeah - it's that what you said. I can't be taken into consideration - cheers jeni

That's the trouble with the law these days - nowhere near pedantic enough!
People are riding roughshod over our legal system signing false fanciful statements with false slightly inaccurate names....[pompous emoticon]

I put it to the court that I am unfit to plead through reasons of insanity

when are you saying you are danger to the safety of the realm?