Crikey; I can see both sides of this, really. As a mum I'm sure that the MIL, having spoken to her son who was distressed just wanted to go to him[ I'm sure I would have done the same]. She shouldn't have held the baby, and that's a definite. There are a lot of hormones floating around when a baby is born, and that includes the grandmother as well. Young mothers get a lot of info from organisations such as the NCT about bonding etc and seem to be obsessed with having a certain type of birth and then are distressed because most of the time babies decide not to follow the 'birthing plan'. I was terribly upset because my MIL walked into my room and said 'haven't come to see you; have come to see the baby', and then said straight away 'oh, that's a 'their family surname'. She was a sweet, jovial lady, and didn't mean to hurt me but, boy was I upset! I guess a mothers instinct is to not let anyone else hold her baby and that instinct is at it's strongest at the birth [when the mother is at her most vulnerable].