Home Office Worker Arrested

Oh, fgs.

One corrupt official and you condemn the whole of the Home Office staff.

There are many articles, podcasts, commentaries to the same effect from all shades of polictical opinion.

How about Faulty 71 million computer system for example?

But your thread is about this one allegedly crooked official.

Germanshepherdsmum

But your thread is about this one allegedly crooked official.

And then condemning everyone who works for the Home Office.

Well done to the honourable man who reported it, that must have taken some courage.

There are many crooked officials in many walks of life. Thinking banks, parliament, welfare, health, education. Nothing special with the home office.

zakouma66

There are many articles, podcasts, commentaries to the same effect from all shades of polictical opinion.

How about Faulty 71 million computer system for example?

Changing the subject

Maybe the OP should start a new thread about the problems with Atlas and so-called "merged identities" on the computer systems. Frankly, it is a scandal, which the media generally hasn't picked up.

I agree that one crooked official doesn't make the Home Office unfit for purpose. The fact that it's being investigated is a good thing in a way because it shows that bribes won't be tolerated. I would hope that work is going on undercover to investigate any other suspicious activity.

One crooked official doesn't make the HO unfit for purpose. Added to the catalogue of problems, it is a cause for concern.

Hope that helps.

Germanshepherdsmum

But your thread is about this one allegedly crooked official.

makes a change from blaming lefty lawyers

What on earth is it with this attention to detail/ thread police attitude?

I don't think the HO is fit for purpose. There are many articles from many sources saying just that. The Telegraph, independent bodies, ex personnel.

This one case does not make it poorly run organisation but it adds to to the catalogue of errors.

nanna8

There are many crooked officials in many walks of life. Thinking banks, parliament, welfare, health, education. Nothing special with the home office.

I completely agree.

zakouma66

What on earth is it with this attention to detail/ thread police attitude?

I don't think the HO is fit for purpose. There are many articles from many sources saying just that. The Telegraph, independent bodies, ex personnel.

This one case does not make it poorly run organisation but it adds to to the catalogue of errors.

I think your arguing with yourself now 😂

HousePlantQueen

Germanshepherdsmum

But your thread is about this one allegedly crooked official.

makes a change from blaming lefty lawyers

What a silly comment HPQ. The thread referring to lefty lawyers by GSM did in fact point out further along the discussion that it was Cherie Blair's Chambers that took the case on - not going to get much further left than her ? I would imagine GSM used her professional insight into these type of cases and has much knowledge regarding the type of lawyer that takes on such cases.

petra

zakouma66

What on earth is it with this attention to detail/ thread police attitude?

I don't think the HO is fit for purpose. There are many articles from many sources saying just that. The Telegraph, independent bodies, ex personnel.

This one case does not make it poorly run organisation but it adds to to the catalogue of errors.

I think your arguing with yourself now 😂

I have no idea what you mean. I think it's perfectly clear what I'm saying. I can provide numerous links if you are interested.

The HO is not fit for purpose. This is yet another example of the state of affairs.

www.prweek.com/article/1865032/home-office-press-office-not-fit-purpose-editors-say

The Home Office is yet another thing that doesn't work as it should after 14 years of Tory rule. Not for much longer, hopefully. Going off on a tangent, where is Rishi Sunak these days?

Yes, it is perfectly clear what you are saying and you are contradicting yourself:

I don't think the HO is fit for purpose
One crooked official doesn't make the HO unfit for purpose.

It's rather offensive to tar all Home Office employees with the same brush, don't you think?

Or perhaps you're not sure what you think?

Now you're taking a headline about the Home Office Press Office and saying
The HO is not fit for purpose.

Is the Press Office representative of all of the 40,000 civil servants working for the Home Office?

Oh Calli, Have you been on the Sanatogen? You're on fire this afternoon.

zakouma66

Oh Calli, Have you been on the Sanatogen? You're on fire this afternoon.

Not yet 😁
Can't afford it on my pension.

Spinnaker

HousePlantQueen

Germanshepherdsmum

But your thread is about this one allegedly crooked official.

makes a change from blaming lefty lawyers

What a silly comment HPQ. The thread referring to lefty lawyers by GSM did in fact point out further along the discussion that it was Cherie Blair's Chambers that took the case on - not going to get much further left than her ? I would imagine GSM used her professional insight into these type of cases and has much knowledge regarding the type of lawyer that takes on such cases.

Thank you Spinnaker.

Wasn't it that venerable Scots Labour MP John Reid who famously said in 2006 that the Home Office wasn't fit for purpose? And he was Home Secretary at the time...

I rest my case. My mistake though, I understand from what she has posted that GSM is/was an accomplished and experienced conveyancing and property lawyer, not involved in criminal or, heaven forfend, human rights law. Thus my comment about lefty lawyers, the thrust and irony of which may have escaped you

I have of course studied criminal law in order to qualify but have never practised it, nor did any firm at which I worked take on criminal work. Human rights law - no way. Wasn’t invented when I was studying (that is a joke btw).