Gransnet forums

TV, radio, film, Arts

The BBC Cuts

(24 Posts)
MayBee70 Sat 20-Jun-26 08:25:19

Mojack26

Loads on BBC3 /4 they should axe!

Most of BBC 4 is repeats and mainly educational and I watch it all the time. It was, I believe, tied up with the Open University but maybe the powers that be don’t want people to be educated sad.

Himdowntheroad Sat 20-Jun-26 08:20:58

BBC News Channel is, in most parts, just really BBC American News

Wyllow3 Fri 19-Jun-26 00:25:48

I'll really miss some: my guess it they have to base some on current viewing figures sadly. Like moneybox is great, but there is so much online advice now.

Wyllow3 Fri 19-Jun-26 00:22:39

Dulostwo11

hopefully they will get rid of this horrible organisation for good.

Positive as ever...

Gin Thu 18-Jun-26 23:58:21

dulostwoll why do you say it is an ‘horrible organisation’? We all,have different tastes but the BBC offers enormous variety catering for diverse tastes and is usuallly less biased than other media. I know many say otherwise but I have usually found it to be far more balanced that others.

There are savings to be made I am sure but no where else can you get such well produced innovative content.

I love the radio but commercial stations are dire. BBC provides me with all my entertainment and information. It does not dumb down, I am amazed when scrolling round what a load of rubbish is broadcast. I hope BBC remains providing world wide availability and admiration.

It is not expensive compared with other streaming services.

4allweknow Thu 18-Jun-26 20:52:37

Greciangirl I'd second that! The whole weekend seems to be filled with football.
I'd add cooking programmes. I like cooking but an awful lot of recipes seem to include recipes with a bit pricey ingredients.

BridgetPark Thu 18-Jun-26 19:16:36

If they really want to save some money, why on earth do they need dozens of different presenters on morning live? They bring in so many different people whose original occupation had nothing to do with presenting. But why employ so many, it's pointless, in my opinion, just use 4 or 5 regular presenters who have the range and experience to do the job capably.

Pandora22 Thu 18-Jun-26 18:44:30

Agree

kittylester Thu 18-Jun-26 18:38:00

I think they should have a dedicated sports channel.

Betony Thu 18-Jun-26 17:43:29

I'm going to miss Amol. He really raised the bar as an interviewer. He took no prisoners, but was never rude like some others!

Cumbrianmale56 Thu 18-Jun-26 16:12:04

missdeke

Just axe the football, that would save plenty, it dominates tv nowadays and not just world cup matches either.

It does get plenty of viewers when the World Cup is on, but programmes like Final Score are a complete waste of money. All you need is someone to read the results and show the tables, which are available online anway. Instead the BBC spends £21 million a year on presenters and pundits who aren't needed and spin the programme out for an hour.

missdeke Thu 18-Jun-26 16:08:27

Just axe the football, that would save plenty, it dominates tv nowadays and not just world cup matches either.

Visgir1 Thu 18-Jun-26 16:06:17

I read they are definitely chopping BBC 3..they reinstated it not that long ago.. Amol Rajan is not being replaced either he's earns around £320k. Will be interesting to see what actually happens. Plus why do they send several reporters to the same area in either this county or overseas.? To report on the same thing?

Mojack26 Thu 18-Jun-26 15:26:48

Loads on BBC3 /4 they should axe!

Wheniwasyourage Thu 18-Jun-26 14:48:40

Quite agree, Applegran. Good post!

I wish they would stop sending a reporter with crew to report on a trial from outside the relevant courtroom. Couldn't they just report from the nearest studio? Also, if something big happens in Scotland, and presumably in Wales and Northern Ireland too, they have local teams reporting on the local news and a team from England reporting on the "national"news. angry Stopping that might save a bit of money.

Greciangirl Thu 18-Jun-26 14:48:17

Separate channels for football.

I’m fed up of the above sport dominating the schedules.

Applegran Thu 18-Jun-26 14:32:17

The government needs to agree a way to fund the BBC appropriately without being able to tell the BBC what to do. It has to stay independent. Not a subscription model or advertisements. The BBC is respected world over and is of great value to us at home and abroad and should be sustained for us all. It has not been perfect - no organisation is. But in times of trouble it has been the most trusted source of reliable and truthful information.. And at all times we need reliable news.

Charleygirl5 Thu 18-Jun-26 14:24:41

It is not worth the money we pay each year. I think Strictly should have been given a break this year and would get rid of Shirley Ballas as she is not impartial.

As we have discussed before, there should be two separate sports programmes during summer to accommodate tennis, horse racing and some athletics.

Dulostwo11 Thu 18-Jun-26 14:12:21

hopefully they will get rid of this horrible organisation for good.

Kamiso Thu 18-Jun-26 13:52:05

I enjoy strictly. Many of the cuts appear to be aimed at the older generation and the majority of youngsters are just not interested.

Perhaps there is a sneaky plan to get rid of the BBC by assuring there will be very few viewers.

Maremia Wed 17-Jun-26 19:43:54

Save Strictly! 💃 🎶

kittylester Wed 17-Jun-26 19:32:57

Our habit is to wake up early, make tea and drink it watching Breakfast - even on a Sunday - which is also to be cut.

But I watch Strictly and enjoy messaging daughters and granddaughters during and about it.

Oldnproud Wed 17-Jun-26 19:04:24

I agree that it is really annoying when programmes you particularly like are axed.

But regarding things like Strictly (which i have watched, but can take it or leave it), don't the BBC make a lot of money from selling them to other countries? I could easily be wrong about that, of course.

Padstow13 Wed 17-Jun-26 18:30:05

Yes, the BBC may need to save money somewhere but getting rid of the likes of MoneyBox Live and The Law Show, among others, is a huge mistake.

There are precious few programmes as informative and on the side of the consumer, whilst I wouldn't for one minute miss Strictly Come Dancing and its ilk.

Just cancelling that for even one season would save a ton of money. And let's add the over-abundance of sports pundits to the list.