If JT has been sacked for the single reason given, ^ it was a long time ago and he doesn’t remember^
that’s a bit odd. If it’s true, then it’s unacceptable, but strange that it only appears now and with no clarification.
DH suggested that they are sacking him now before the anticipated flood of further accusations begins, or maybe because he must have known about GW, which is important, because it means we are all responsible for doing something about each other’s behaviour.
GW’s behaviour was unacceptable. One substantiated accusation is enough.
I am concerned though, that if only 45/84 of the accusations are substantiated/have been upheld, what does that imply about the other 39 complaints.