I have followed this thread with some interest - and thought I would de-lurk to ask a couple of questions if you all don’t mind.
What about the grandparents who have either deliberately or through ignorance systematically has caused psychological damage to the parents of their grandchildren - undoubtedly causing their grandchildren harm in the process?
Should the children (parents of the grandchildren) stand back and say...ah but that was done out of love - although this harmful behaviour has had all of "these" detrimental effects - it was done out of love - so here - even though you cant restrain yourself from causing long term damage to me - your child - for your own purposes - here you go - have a play with my children?
That's not right surely?
This has led me to wondering about who gets to decide what is deliberate and harmful behaviour?
There would seem to be an issue with it being the person who feels harmed (which may be both)
so is it..
- people who set and enforce the rules?
- or the person who had to live by the others rules ?
Doesn’t the person with the power have to take responsibility for the problem - even if it has been created by ignorance?
Or is this all about a reversal of power as children have children? and does that in some way negate the original harm ?
Sorry - that was more questions than I thought it would be. 
Keeping Cool Tips! Let’s swap?



. No explanation, no warning; nothing and we've had no contact with our GS since.
. And what of all the equipment we'd bought? They never bothered to ask but fortunately I'd purchased it from a mail order catalogue I'd used for years, and even though I'd past the date to return the goods, I was in such a state that they allowed me to return it all and get our money back. 