Gransnet forums

News & politics

Uk defences

(130 Posts)
fancythat Sat 28-Mar-26 12:08:07

The Uk navy is the most depleted since 1642.

If the US decides to stop funding NATO, where does that leave the Uk and Europe?
Especially against a possible landgrab by Russia, in the Eastern Countries of Europe. At some, maybe not too distant point.

And this assumes that the US doesnt help Russia.

We could be left in a quite precarious position.

Hopefully and prayerfully, things wont get to the worst case scenarios.

fancythat Sat 28-Mar-26 13:35:43

Granatlast007
Thank you for that info.

I realise I now dont know a single person who is in the Uk navy.
Havent done for a while now.

petra Sat 28-Mar-26 13:37:33

fancythat

Where does it say that?
Pretty sure it doesnt.

And what about education?

I would rather not have to report you petra.
So I wont for now.

Go ahead, report me. Shaking in my boots 😂
I assumed ( obviously wrong 😂) that people would understand I was paraphrasing the bible quote.
Psalm 141:3
Set a guard oh lord over my mouth. Keep watch over the door of my lips.

Granatlast007 Sat 28-Mar-26 13:42:39

Allira

fancythat

Where does it say that?
Pretty sure it doesnt.

And what about education?

I would rather not have to report you petra.
So I wont for now.

🤔

Absolutely, the navy and armed forces have been downgraded in a world which seemed safer not so long ago. So many things needing funding, no one wanting to pay taxes, we seem to be living a dangerous divine where people announce they only want to pay for what they themselves use (eg, why should I pay for education if I don't have children), but expect top quality infrastructure, mended roads, services provided, governments who leap to bring you home immediately if you happen to have holidayed somewhere where trouble has broken out and so on.

Expectations have gone through the roof with a whole load of shouting and demands and little attention to reality.

Well thanks to Russia and the orange man, a reality check has arrived, I wish we could all take a step back and think about supporting instead of shouting.

Cossy Sat 28-Mar-26 13:45:57

fancythat

Where does it say that?
Pretty sure it doesnt.

And what about education?

I would rather not have to report you petra.
So I wont for now.

Please don’t report Petra.

I absolutely and completely understand her anger and agree with her!

I also think sometimes, if you’ve lived outside of the UK for many decades, it’s far too easy to sit back and throw insulting statements out, then to attempt to justify them by accusing others of gaslighting Sorry, but the initial comment and follow up accusations were bang out of order!

Granatlast007 Sat 28-Mar-26 13:46:10

'divide' of course, not divine, perhaps AI is trying to be ironic!

RosiesMawagain Sat 28-Mar-26 13:49:16

nanna8

Well before that they defeated the Spanish Armada but these days they would probably have just hidden away and admitted defeat.

This is frankly appalling and insults all those in the Royal and Merchant Navies including those who ran the Atlantic convoys in WWI and brought food to your grandparents, possibly parents in England before you and your family emigrated to Australia. You clearly have no concept of the role of aircraft carriers, minesweepers, battleships, cargo ships, clippers, not to mention the thousands of “small ships” who risked all to rescue our troops from Dunkirk.
I am shocked at your suggestion of cowardice and think you owe a grovelling apology not least to any families or descendants of our brave sailors in the two twentieth century world wars not forgetting the Falklands War and those who lost their lives.

Norah Sat 28-Mar-26 13:51:49

petra

I’m reminded of the biblical quote ^Please lord help me to keep my mouth shut until I know what I’m talking about^

"Set a guard, O LORD, over my mouth" (Psalm 141:3).

It is a plea for self-control, discernment, and the humility to remain silent rather than speaking rashly or foolishly.

LizzieDrip Sat 28-Mar-26 13:52:42

“I absolutely and completely understand her anger and agree with her!”

Hear, hear Cossy.

I too agree with Petra. The comment, by an Australian poster, effectively calling our naval service men & women cowards, was deplorable.

AGAA4 Sat 28-Mar-26 13:59:02

Britain should be preparing for war. Many people are agreed that this is important now but are unwilling to pay more in taxes or cut services.

A government's first responsibility is the safety of the people and after years of neglect will have to make some unpopular decisions if we want to build up our armed forces.

fancythat Sat 28-Mar-26 14:00:32

AGAA4

Britain should be preparing for war. Many people are agreed that this is important now but are unwilling to pay more in taxes or cut services.

A government's first responsibility is the safety of the people and after years of neglect will have to make some unpopular decisions if we want to build up our armed forces.

I agree.

petra Sat 28-Mar-26 14:07:09

RosiesMawagain

nanna8

Well before that they defeated the Spanish Armada but these days they would probably have just hidden away and admitted defeat.

This is frankly appalling and insults all those in the Royal and Merchant Navies including those who ran the Atlantic convoys in WWI and brought food to your grandparents, possibly parents in England before you and your family emigrated to Australia. You clearly have no concept of the role of aircraft carriers, minesweepers, battleships, cargo ships, clippers, not to mention the thousands of “small ships” who risked all to rescue our troops from Dunkirk.
I am shocked at your suggestion of cowardice and think you owe a grovelling apology not least to any families or descendants of our brave sailors in the two twentieth century world wars not forgetting the Falklands War and those who lost their lives.

Cheering from the rooftops. 👏👏👏👏👏

Cossy Sat 28-Mar-26 14:08:45

AGAA4

Britain should be preparing for war. Many people are agreed that this is important now but are unwilling to pay more in taxes or cut services.

A government's first responsibility is the safety of the people and after years of neglect will have to make some unpopular decisions if we want to build up our armed forces.

I agree and I would happily pay more in my taxes for this, even though we’re not in any way wealthy. I want to protect this country and others, war is never the answer but we do need good solid defences.

RosiesMawagain Sat 28-Mar-26 14:09:35

Out of interest, and before we get too bogged down in frankly ridiculous and ill-informed opinions from down under, but what do you base this on?
The Uk navy is the most depleted since 1642

RosiesMawagain Sat 28-Mar-26 14:16:38

A simple search brought up the following, which entirely contradicts your assertion

The Stuart Period and Early Challenges (1642–1688) Following the English Civil War, the restored monarchy recognized the navy's necessity for national defence and trade, though it faced challenges like the Dutch victory in the 1667 Medway raid.
Emergence of Dominance (1688–1763)
Britain established, then asserted, its maritime superiority over France , notably winning four wars during this period. The navy gained valuable experience in global operations, protecting shipping while breaking enemy trade links.
The Napoleonic Wars and Global Dominance (1793–1815): The Royal Navy displayed unmatched prowess, culminating in Admiral Nelson’s victories. The 1805 Battle of Trafalgar cemented Britain's total dominance of the sea for a century.
Pax Britannica and Technology (1815–1914)
Britain commanded the world's largest navy, ensuring relative global peace and protecting its massive empire. By 1889, Britain enforced the "Two-Power Standard," requiring the navy to be as strong as the next two largest navies combined
World Wars and Modern Role (1914–Present)
In WWI, the navy successfully protected trade routes and controlled key waters. While the economic constraints of WWII shifted global supremacy to the USA, the Royal Navy remained a prominent force (Surface Fleet, Submarine Service, Fleet Air Arm)

Granatlast007 Sat 28-Mar-26 14:16:54

He who takes offense when no offense is intended is a fool, and he who takes offense when offense is intended is a greater fool.
— Brigham Young

RosiesMawagain Sat 28-Mar-26 14:19:07

And he who gratuitously gives offence deserves all he gets
RosiesMawAgain 2026

Casdon Sat 28-Mar-26 14:19:37

It is happening already.
AI summary:
The Royal Navy is undergoing significant modernisation, with
new classes of ships currently under construction.
Key additions include Type 26 City-class anti-submarine frigates, Type 31 Inspiration-class general-purpose frigates, Dreadnought-class nuclear submarines, and Fleet Solid Support ships, aimed at increasing the fleet's capacity by the 2030s.
GOV.UK
+3
Key New Vessel Programs:
Type 26 (City Class) Frigates: Eight advanced anti-submarine warfare vessels are planned. The first, HMS Glasgow, Cardiff, and Belfast, are expected before 2030, with five more to follow.
Type 31 (Inspiration Class) Frigates: Five vessels (HMS Venturer, Active, Formidable, Bulldog, and Campbeltown) are being built in Scotland, designed for flexibility and to be in service by the early 2030s.
Dreadnought-class Submarines: The next generation of ballistic missile submarines (four in total) is currently under construction to replace the Vanguard class.
Fleet Solid Support (FSS) Ships: New vessels to support the Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA), including the recently initiated RFA Resurgent, built to sustain aircraft carriers.
Type 32 Frigates: Planned for the future to further bolster the escort fleet, though these remain in the early concept phase as of 2026.
GOV.UK
+6
The strategy emphasises a hybrid fleet, combining traditional crewed warships with increasing numbers of uncrewed, automated vessels for specialised missions.
The House of Commons Library
+1
Unfortunately it takes a considerable time to build these ships, so we can’t increase our capacity overnight.

RosiesMawagain Sat 28-Mar-26 14:24:00

And pre 1642 we weren’t exactly on our uppers either

Tudor Standing Navy (16th Century): The Navy began to take shape as a professional establishment. Henry VIII is often considered the founder of the Royal Navy as a permanent force
The Spanish Armada (1588): A defining moment where superior English ship design and manoeuvrability , and gunnery defeated a larger Spanish fleet, highlighting the effectiveness of a dedicated navy.
Early 17th Century Challenges (1603–1642): Following the Union of the Crowns, the navy's efficiency declined and corruption grew, necessitating an inquiry in 1618. During this period, the navy struggled to combat Barbary corsairs, and England's relative naval power declined against the Dutch and French
Ship Money (1634): Charles I levied this unpopular tax to fund naval expansion, which, while strengthening the fleet's hardware, became a major grievance leading to the English Civil War

Down to money again?

AGAA4 Sat 28-Mar-26 14:24:47

RosiesMawagain

^And he who gratuitously gives offence deserves all he gets^
RosiesMawAgain 2026

😂 well said.

fancythat Sat 28-Mar-26 14:27:09

I dont remember where I read it from ^RosiesMawagain.
But this is AI.

AI Overview
The claim that the Royal Navy is as depleted as it was during the English Civil War (mid-17th century) has been highlighted by defence analysts and researchers in 2026, noting that the fleet is smaller than at any point since that era. While modern ships are exponentially more powerful, the total number of vessels has reached historic lows, with reports indicating only 13 major surface combatants (destroyers and frigates) and just over 70 ships total including support vessels.
Facebook
Facebook
+2
Key Indicators of Naval Depletion (2026)
Smallest Size in 400 Years: Researchers from King’s College London stated that the current number of hulls is smaller than at any point since the mid-17th century.
Operational Availability: Critics have described the situation as "dangerously depleted," with reports that often only a handful of the 13 destroyers/frigates are operational at sea, due to, or waiting for, maintenance.
Personnel Shortages: The navy has seen significant decreases in personnel compared to previous decades, dropping to around 32,000 personnel, including the Royal Marines.
Maintenance Backlogs: Many of the Royal Navy's vessels are stuck in ports for long-term repairs, with reports suggesting that both aircraft carriers have been affected by operational availability challenges.
The Week
The Week
+3
Comparison with History
Vs. WWII: In 1939, the Royal Navy had over 1,400 ships.
Vs. 1982: During the Falklands War, the UK deployed 127 ships, 43 of which were warships.
Vs. 17th Century: While raw numbers are lower than or comparable to the Civil War era, a single modern Type 45 destroyer possesses more potential lethality than a fleet of 17th-century ships. However, the ability to be present globally has severely diminished.
Reddit
Reddit
+4
The situation is often attributed to long-term under-resourcing, delayed procurement programs, and a reliance on US naval power, resulting in a navy that struggles to cover all its required duties

fancythat Sat 28-Mar-26 14:27:39

Could have been any number of sources. By the looks of things.

fancythat Sat 28-Mar-26 14:27:59

That I read it from.

fancythat Sat 28-Mar-26 14:29:44

Casdon Unfortunately it takes a considerable time to build these ships, so we can’t increase our capacity overnight.

No. Quite.

butterandjam Sat 28-Mar-26 14:30:32

@ fancythat

The Uk navy is the most depleted since 1642

Back in 1642 the Btitish Navy did not have a fleet of nuclear powered and nuclear armed submarines, nor did it have aircraft carriers , or the airborne backing of the RAF.

So it's rather hard to make any qualitative comparison between defences then and now.

The lack of archers and bows and arrows in today's army is of no concern.

Fallingstar Sat 28-Mar-26 14:32:11

I agree with Petra too and can understand her anger, I am pretty annoyed too, is bad enough having our armed services disrespected by Trump.