MaizieD
Carney might be fine on the international aspect and be able to deal effectively with Trump, but if Canadians are looking to him to solve problems in the domestic economy they might well be disappointed.
He follows the neo liberal economic 'orthodoxy', the one that has brought the UK to its knees since being introduced by Thatcher in the 1980s. ( It is also responsible for the current socio economic plight of the US. Reagan was a great enthusiast, too.)
If a failure to improve socioeconomic conditions for a large part of the population is what Trudeau was disliked for I wouldn't hold out much hope of much social/economic change under Carney. It would be more of the same. The Conservatives wouldn't have offered anything much different, either.
I have heard it said that his people management skills aren't all they could be...that's just rumour/hearsay but may be a possibility to bear in mind.
He was elected on the basis of being the best person/party to stand up against Trump though, and to develop Canada’s relationships with international allies. He won’t be perfect, and the electorate must realise that - but the vote share has increased, and if it’s a minority government by only very few seats, which looks likely, they must be prepared to take both the good and bad aspects of him in charge.