Chewbacca
^Children who have no gender.^
The grandmother in the film admitted, once away from "mapa", that he/she/them/they, far from allowing the child to be gender neutral as they claimed, kept foisting dresses and feminine things upon Nika who knew they were really male, preferred to play with cars and wanted to be a builder when they grew up. Nika was clearly uncomfortable discussing whether he was a boy or a girl in front of "mapa", but confirmed that he was a boy when he was away from them. Is it any wonder that Swedish boys are failing in school and have twice the rate of suicides? Wtf are they doing; messing up children's heads with this mind f**kery? Are the TRAs and their allies really ok with f**king up their children's mental health on the alter of living their authentic selves? I hope every single one of the kids that gets embroiled in this manufactured dystopian nightmare, sues the arses off their parents when they get to adulthood and realise that they were guinea pigs in a social experiment.
I'm not a psychologist, so bear with me, but I'd like to see a proper definition of an 'authentic self'.
It's unlikely to be anything fundamental, as clothing, toys and leisure activities (I can't think of much else that so-called 'gender' would influence in the life of a small child) aren't going to the root of what it is to be human (if that is what is mean by 'the self').
If children are allowed to play with what they like, and are dressed in trackies and t-shirts/jumpers they can still be a boy or a girl, based on sex, without making them feel 'inauthentic'. It's not until later (I think - I'm not an anatomist either :grin: ) that their bodies develop in ways that differentiate male children from female ones to the point that it would be unfair to the girls to make them compete against the boys.
What would not being an 'authentic self' mean in that context? IME it is the norm, not the exception, for children to be taught this way at school and in most homes - mine certainly were, and it is 25 years since the youngest started school. It wasn't like 'our day', when there were very clear demarkations between the lives of boys and girls, with different subjects taught, different playground games, different registers and so on. At home, children are not like Just William and Violet Elizabeth either. The days are long gone when girls wore frilly dresses they couldn't get dirty, unlike the boys who had grazed knees and muddy faces, and the people who go on about climbing trees are usually the same ones who complain that children of both sexes spend too much time indoors.
The whole thing really does seem like some sort of statement from the parents/teachers, and I can't help thinking that a lot of this is exactly that. Where are the qualified people in this? Why aren't they speaking out, one way or the other? Have they been silenced?
It comes across to me (who is entirely unqualified in this area) as a lot of half-baked 'theories' being spouted by people who know no more than I do, but are more concerned about appearing to be 'tolerant', or 'forward thinking', or what used to be called 'cool'.