Kandinsky
*It doesn’t matter what ‘woke’ means to any of you. It wasn’t intended for your use any more than any other urban American slang term was. It’s not an insult. Frankly I cringe thinking so many older, and yes white, people seeking to redefine what it is supposed to mean. As usual, cultural appropriation at its worst has run-amok with this term*
Absolutely!
I’ve looked up Leadbelly.
He died 15 years before I was even born.
Not an excuse to not have heard of significant historical people I know, but he was a jazz musician not Martin Luther King, & I’m not really into jazz & neither were my parents. I’ve also never heard of any of his songs, ( having looked them up ) although I know most of Ella Fitzgerald’s & Louis Armstrong’s - so he couldn’t have been particularly mainstream.
But I’m clearly not a ‘cool, arty’. gran.
Yes that quote absolutely! outside the framework from where it emanated, it's pretty meaningless, at best a bit of a nothing word at worst simply fatuous.
Unfortunately flying out of the Pandora's Box that would encompass what would be regarded as "woke" are some of the most illiberal attitudes and intolerant people that maybe deserve the pejorative way the word is used against them.
For example, Riley Gains, female swimmer and sportswoman who put forward the point of view of the unfairness of competing against and having the indignity of sharing a locker room with trans woman 6ft 4inch, male bodied Lia Thomas, was ambushed and physically hit at San Francisco State University, by those who had an opposing view. In an age when "be kind" is wheeled out in a passive aggressive "just agree with whatever I say way" to anyone with a dissenting view in the promotion of different ideologies. I would ask how kind were these people who bullied and intimated Riley Gains? Whilst the Democrats would seek to represent a more liberal voice in the US, it was shocking to note that the recent "Save Women's Sports' Bill" passed without a single Democrat vote 
Life just isn't so black and white, or either or for most people. Neither the Democrats or the Republicans represent a viable choice for many, they certainly wouldn't for me. There's no way on God's earth I'd want to vote for an administration in thrall to the gun lobby. Every time there is yet another shoot out the sheet madness of a country allowing citizens the rights to bear arms as if they are still living in the wild west is just beyond comprehension.Then of course there is the Republican's regressive anti abortion legislation which has put women's rights back decades.
Having said that many of the Democratic run states and cities appear to be spiralling into "no go areas", umpteen citizens, homeless living in tents, non compos mentis, through the wide spread use of opioids, making sidewalks places to avoid, businesses suffering through lack of footfall as the sidewalks are avoided. How feasible is it, for example, to allow robberies of up to a $1,000 without fear of prosecution, facilitating a downward spiral into a perpetual state of lawlessness . So for me it really isn't a matter, or left wing equals good and right wing equals bad. What we have in so many democracies now is a choice between a rock and a hard place, neither appeals quite honestly.
On the one hand, whilst paradoxically, there is a complete laissez faire attitude towards what a so called liberal governments ordain as acceptable, express an opinion or a protest against the orthodox point of view, such as questioning the vaccine programme as the truckers did in Trudeau's Canada, when he took the extreme/authoritarian measure of freezing them out of their bank accounts, Good God did that liberal mask slip revealing the dictator behind. Presumably he would be regarded as one of the "woke" leaders,. Woke possibly, but certainly not democratic!
I don't really understand the OP quite honestly there have always been kind caring people who do their best for society and support charities. After my mother died and I was winding up her estate, when I went through her bank statements I was amazed to see just how many DDs she had going out to various charities, I had no idea because it was just something she did without speaking about it. There are millions like her, just quietly going about trying to help others. I'm pretty sure those who stoically just get on with good works do so because they are driven by a social conscience and not the need to be labelled by what is to all intents and purposes a puerile word outside the context from where it originally derived.