Gransnet forums

Chat

Meghan and Harry

(444 Posts)
mcem Mon 15-Oct-18 08:57:39

Anyone ready to start knitting royal baby jackets?

Rufus2 Sun 21-Oct-18 12:09:25

The Australians seem to be lapping it up
Day6; Are they ever! Can't get enough and now David and Victoria have arrived! We are truly blessed! wink OoRoo

"if speaking was more important than listening, we'd have 2 tongues and one ear" Taffy Thomas MBE

Day6 Sun 21-Oct-18 12:13:57

"Harry's way" to my mind Merlot was to use his incredible privilege and top notch network to get an introduction to an actress he fancied. Previously he'd partied his way around the world. I used to rather like him, seeing him as a lost, motherless boy who joined the forces and found camaraderie in the army but as the spare heir he has rather mirrored Princess Margaret with a life of glamorous hob-nobbing and partying.

I am a fan of a much trimmed down monarchy. Displays of Harry and his trophy wife turning on their "we love you" performances just don't warm the cockles in the way the dignified and regal appearances used to.

I think that evolution has a lot to do with it. The monarchy cannot stand still, but perhaps with the march of time we also have to ask if we can stomach the Harry and Meghan show across the globe for the foreseeable future. Their having a baby is really not THAT newsworthy.

Where is it all going to end? You just know that "Child of Meghan and Harry, The Sequel" is just going to run and run. Most of us will be dead and gone when that one is partying with the rich celebrities of his time, who will of course be the offspring of the Cloonies, Beckhams, Cordens, Williams and John-Furnishes etc, etc.

It's got out of hand imo but the majority lap it up without question.

Time to close all but the front windows of that huge department store imo. Bargain basement tat is filtering its way up to the top floor. We just don't need so many jewels in the crown.

Day6 Sun 21-Oct-18 12:19:30

Oh Rufus no!!!!

Aaaaargh. Cannot bear the Beckhams. Self publicists who typify all that's wrong with modern society. Best pals with royalty....Please, pass the sick bucket.

I suppose turning off all screens is the only way to blank out the huge vomit-inducing sleb-fest. [sick]

lemongrove Sun 21-Oct-18 12:20:17

There’s always one ‘party’ type in the RF, ( or black sheep)
So Harry is fulfilling his destiny !
He’s certainly different to William.

Jalima1108 Sun 21-Oct-18 12:20:23

I couldn't help thinking the queen would not have to do this.
annep but I can't imagine that any Head of State would have to do that either.

We just don't need so many jewels in the crown.
Perhaps the Queen and Prince Philip should have gone to Australia and the South Pacific, started up the Invictus Games etc.
What else are they doing with their time these days? Mustn't let them loll around doing nothing.

gillybob Sun 21-Oct-18 12:24:10

I couldn’t agree with you more Day6.

Rufus2 Sun 21-Oct-18 12:28:07

Carry on imagining me as tall, slim and elegant everyone
Careful Jalima! you're plagiarising! I've got copyright on that bit of flattery; not to be used indiscriminately on all and sundry without permission. I only use it on special occasions, but you could be the exception to the rule! grin
Btw. how's that boiled fruit cake coming along? You can put icing on it if you know how! cupcake wine

Day6 Sun 21-Oct-18 12:32:05

I think that's the point though Jalima. The Queen and Philip have done their bit, admirably, for decades and been loved for their much more regal, dignified and "distant" presence.

Look at the contrast. We now have The Harry and Meghan global extravaganza representing them. I

We all know it will be Harry, Meghan, David and Victoria before long.

The world has gone a bit star-struck, hasn't it?

I have opted out. It just seems so wrong. I am turning a little bit republican until a sense of proportion has returned to the house of Windsor. I suspect I'll have a very long wait.

annep Sun 21-Oct-18 12:35:19

The queen is probably busy knitting for the new baby - save the newlyweds some money. It's not easy paying the mortgage!

Jalima1108 Sun 21-Oct-18 12:38:00

annep I have some lovely old-fashioned knitting patterns grin

lemongrove Sun 21-Oct-18 12:38:28

I am a lot , not a little, Republican, it can’t come soon enough.
However, none of the flummery is the fault of any RF individual, they have just been born into it.
The Queen has done a good job of it, Charles would too and also William IMHO.

lemongrove Sun 21-Oct-18 12:38:57

It just all needs to go.

Anniebach Sun 21-Oct-18 13:15:27

I am not a republican, a president with no political leanings ? I doubt very much. The thought of yet another election every five years ? No thank you.

Charles is slimming down the numbers, there has been some changes. Only the children of the monarch or children of the heir can now hold the title prince or princess. Harry’s children cannot.

I like the tradition and have a thing about dignity which queenie certaintly has. I don’t want royals doing the ‘i feel your pain’ act. Queenie doesn’t , Charles doesn’t and I think William and Kate will follow them.

And as for holding hands because we are soooo in love, yuck.

alchemilla Sun 21-Oct-18 14:37:01

Anniebach William and Kate certainly haven't followed the Queen in keeping dignified - if "I feel your pain" is your version of dignified. Princess Diana certainly didn't. Harry seems always to have been more ebullient and the fact he's not the heir means he's had more freedom than his brother. He's chosen a wife who suits him who also has more freedom than Kate and can be more outspoken. I'm sure there are enough protocolmeisters among the Windsor courtiers to rein them both in if the romantic handholding gets too much. However, it seems to be going down well in Oz and among the British population (or at least those who aren't uninterested in the RF or too interested in the Daily Fail).

annep Sun 21-Oct-18 14:44:37

Jalima look what I found. Nice photo.

Anniebach Sun 21-Oct-18 15:03:25

True Diana certaintly didn’t, Harry follows her, where there’s a camera

Jalima1108 Sun 21-Oct-18 16:35:52

And as for holding hands because we are soooo in love, yuck
hmm yes, a bit yucky I agree. Perhaps the Aussies won't mind though.

Wasn't it an Australian PM who touched the Queen shock?

Nice picture annep - but what's that thing on the floor, it doesn't look like a corgi! Perhaps Princess Elizabeth had knitted it.

Anniebach Sun 21-Oct-18 18:12:43

It seems to me she is over acting . She can’t be nervous , she addressed the UN, walked down the aisle with no arm to hold, been married before then had an affair then met Harry, an actress too.

Funny looking Corgie, perhaps a foot muff for the QM

annep Sun 21-Oct-18 18:55:12

Think knitting bag half hidden by small table?

Fennel Sun 21-Oct-18 20:03:29

Well I think it's ridiculous that a young woman in the early stages of pregnancy should be expected to do this royal tour.
Wasn't Kate hospitalised at this stage of her pregnancy?

callgirl1 Sun 21-Oct-18 21:26:58

Can I just say one thing, and then disappear from this thread?
What is wrong with them holding hands? I think it`s lovely.

Anniebach Sun 21-Oct-18 21:52:47

A time and a place ?

Iam64 Sun 21-Oct-18 22:27:36

Hello callgirl - so do I, nothing at all wrong with showing affection. It’s 2018 not 1918 or even 1958.

Anniebach Sun 21-Oct-18 22:39:48

Why the need to show it? This is why I have doubts about her. There is no need , affection between two people is just that , special for each other not the world. And no, I do not mean not sharing moments in public but this is constant clinging . It cannot be because she is nervous , she did that walk down the aisle alone, any woman who can do that is very self assured and confident .

In my opinion.

Jalima1108 Sun 21-Oct-18 22:51:57

Probably you're right callgirl and Iam64 - we're just not used to any of the RF showing affection in public.

Fennel I agree, apparently she's feeling awful; hope it doesn't last. I felt like s**t all the way through my first pregnancy.