Gransnet forums

Chat

New Royal Baby

(154 Posts)
glammanana Mon 04-Sept-17 12:26:50

Just heard the news this morning a new baby due for William & Kate next year I hope she stays well as she suffered with the last two pregnancies.Sending congratulations.

Iam64 Wed 06-Sept-17 08:22:52

Good point SueDonim, in addition, if you aren't interested, or find it makes you so angry, don't read it.

Rhinestone Wed 06-Sept-17 11:48:22

The Queen had four children. Was there outrage back then?
I'm an American who doesn't understand why you still have royalty in this day and age but I do see that they are involved in humanitarian causes. Beats what's going on over here. I say they must really want that next baby being that Kate gets so ill.

Helmsley444 Wed 06-Sept-17 11:51:12

Why cant people live and let live.
No body can choose what their born into.
I for myself am happy for both wills and kate .
I also had HG .With both of my sons, and even lost two pregnancies who where girls.
I dont no if HG was related , but sticky blood was .
Im telling you now, that HG Is the most awful illness when one is expecting. With my 2nd son , I also had a toddler A house A job and parents to look after etc etc
.The world is full of misery and doom
.I myself have been chronically ill for 23 years.im only 56
.I believe despite , all her privaledge , and as one who knows,Kate is very brave to elext for another child.
Id suffered so much and was hospitalised twice .I didnt try again and had only my 2 boys.Goodluck to anyone having a new life.

gillybob Wed 06-Sept-17 12:17:33

I'm an American who doesn't understand why you still have royalty in this day and age

I'm British and neither do I Rhinestone

I certainly don't look up to any of them. They are human beings like all of us although they are so far away from reality, they would be better off in Disneyland.

Jane10 Wed 06-Sept-17 12:22:38

You don't have to look up to them!

paddyann Wed 06-Sept-17 12:24:41

can I say I am NOT jealous of the royals or anyone else,have never been jealous of anyone in my life.I have a very good life with a great standard of living ...all worked for by my OH and me...for 50 years ..happy to have been able to achieve the life we have through our own effort,not because of who our family is .

Day6 Wed 06-Sept-17 12:25:26

Helmsley- Kate is very brave to elext for another child.

No one forced her. She and William chose to have another baby I assume.

She may be feeling wretchedly sick because she is pregnant, but she is being cossetted and monitored ALL THE TIME and has to do nothing but put her feet up. Her sickness will pass.

I am sorry, but in my book, that is NOT bravery.

Bravery is carrying on when all around you is in chaos, when your worries cloud your world but you keep going, when life is grim but you continue to support others, when you have crippling , chronic illness but try not to let it deter you from doing things, when you hit rock bottom but find the strength somewhere to cling on...

That is day to day braveness. Choosing to have another child when you live a privileged and pampered life is self-indulgence, something you choose to do.

Kate entered into this with her eyes open, and a team of doctors on constant standby, day and night (such privilege!) and someone else to clean up the vomit. All she has to do is rest.

Sorry for being blunt, but I know lots of people who are TRULY brave. Kate is not one of them.

Anniebach Wed 06-Sept-17 12:28:05

i agree Jane

MissAdventure Wed 06-Sept-17 12:30:10

Agree with day6 regarding Kate's 'bravery'.

auntbett Wed 06-Sept-17 12:49:02

If they're happy - fine. Boring!!

Ilovecheese Wed 06-Sept-17 14:09:13

But wouldn't a thread be boring if it was just a long list of statements from people agreeing with each other.

MissAdventure Wed 06-Sept-17 14:13:05

Differences of opinion can be respectfully given though.
I totally agree with the idea that there are many people braver than Kate, with all the help she will be getting. I dont need to insult her, or anyone who believes she is brave.

Anniebach Wed 06-Sept-17 14:35:16

A thread with all agreeing would be a miracle

gillybob Wed 06-Sept-17 14:50:57

I can't even begin to imagine how many people/doctors/midwives she will have fussing over her at the moment.

Oldwoman70 Wed 06-Sept-17 14:53:44

Ilovecheese - have you tried reading the political threads!

Ilovecheese Wed 06-Sept-17 15:26:00

Oldwoman70 Yes I enjoy them most of the time, but not when they get too repetitive. (Ah say, I enjoy them most of the time but not when they get too repetitive.)

railman Sun 10-Sept-17 10:58:59

I noticed this thread still has the occasional posts, but I can't see how our monarchy is any more or less 'brilliant' than any other European kingdoms.

In our case, since we have a constitutional monarchy, it is very much a political institution. Maybe on that basis, additional 'royal' babies is a political topic too?

Our neighbours Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Belgium, Netherlands and Spain also have monarchies.

Mind you, I can't see any of our following the Dutch approach: www.expatica.com/nl/news/End-of-the-cycling-monarchy_169266.html

Or the Norwegians perhaps: www.royalcourt.no/nyhet.html?tid=157612&sek=27262

NotAGran55 Sun 10-Sept-17 12:18:27

Kate didn't have HG with her two previous pregnacies she had morning sickness . Once she got past the first trimester she was back to her normal glowing life . Let's see what happens this time .

It's insulting to women who have suffered with HG . Vomiting day and night throughout their entire pregnancies , totally dehydrated , vitamin and iron deficient , bleeding gums and tongue , repeated hospitalisations , muscle loss , vomiting during labour , and having to be turned to the side to avoid chocking to death ...

MawBroon Sun 10-Sept-17 12:33:00

Sorry, beg to differ. She was far from "blooming" except perhaps towards the very end of her pregnancies and even Royals are not hospitalised for "morning sickness"

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/she-said/2014/sep/27/hyperemesis-gravidarum-kate-middletons-ongoing-condition-is-much-worse-than-just-morning-sickness

paddyann Sun 10-Sept-17 13:20:30

well MawBroon I spent weeks in a hospital bed because of HG ,didn't put on weight and left hospital AFTER the birth almost a stone lighter than I had been before I was pregnant,so yes people ARE hospitalized for it and yes many suffered far worse than she appeared to.

MawBroon Sun 10-Sept-17 13:22:52

No, I said * hospitalised for morning sickness* NOT HG.
That was my point.
I am sorry if that was not clear.m

MawBroon Sun 10-Sept-17 13:24:41

not hospitalised for (mere) morning sickness
That was my point.

Ilovecheese Sun 10-Sept-17 13:25:07

paddyann wasn't Mawbroon saying the same thing that you are - that is wasn't just morning sickness it was HG

MawBroon Sun 10-Sept-17 13:26:50

Thank you ilovecheese
Frustrating when someone gets the wrong end of the stick and then proceeds to beat one about the head with it. hmm

Elegran Sun 10-Sept-17 13:27:13

In the past there have been deaths due to hyperemesis gravidarum ( In the whole North West Scotland there were 14 maternal deaths due to hyperemesis gravidarum between 1931 and 1940) but more knowledge and better treatments, such as intravenous nutrition to counter the almost total loss of nourishment, have made death extremely rare since 1955.

It is still a hellish condition!

www.pregnancysicknesssupport.org.uk/resources/literature-review/hyperemesis-gravidarum-as-a-cause/