Lol I thought that then re-read post, bless....
Gransnet forums
Chat
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Sign up to Gransnet Daily
Our free daily newsletter full of hot threads, competitions and discounts
Subscribe
I went off David Attenborough a while ago because of his anti-humanism. Now he has said something ageist as well: "If I wanted to put my feet and sit in the corner and slobber, then I could."
Because people do that by choice? Right?
Not impressed ?
Somebody can open a book on whether this will get deleted because I've expressed dislike of a media 'god'.
Lol I thought that then re-read post, bless....
Oh dear.. I haven't exactly sat in a corner and slobbered but have had two weeks of feeling sorry for myself, slopping around, eating (and drinking) rubbish and worst of all wasted two weeks of gym membership! Poor DA, he opened his mouth and put his foot in it. I do that a lot too, especially in relation to humans.
Ah well maybe back to the gym and a healthy diet next week (although there are the election results!!) Maybe I'll give it another week.
at the seaside so I can put my head in the sand
Maybe half before the dentist & half after the election, just a thought ??
Just to add to the misery I have a dental appointment tomorrow!
So a brandy could be in order (but not a whole bottle)
Nice & sunny here today so I will make it a bottle, & hope it warms up in your neck of the woods, (depending on everyone's views some of of us could be feeling chilly by tomorrow night !!!?
PS TY, gaga ?
It's too cold here to sit outside
I might do on the 2nd or 3rd lol !!
don't slop it down yourself norose4
Thanks Baggs you are absolutely right, think I will take a glass of ,ohhps meant cup of tea into the garden ?
I don't mind sounding like my mother
but I do worry when DH begins to sound like his (although I was very fond of her she was proud of being just plain awkward!).
Take encouragement from beginning to sound like your mother, norose; it means it has all happened before and will again 
Yes I agree W11girl, I think each generation brings up the next generation differently than their own, there are some amazing young people around, but sad to say with today's media & focus on me,me me a lot have been brought up to be pretty clueless about the wider world, & live in a bubble of hair , make up, clothes , implants, nose jobs , amazing sex!!? etc etc wonderful homes full of gadgets , nothing wrong with wanting that , but it comes at a price & is pretty near dammed impossible. I actually feel sorry for them, at least we weren't disappointed we didn't expect the impossible & we knew we had to work for it, oh dear I am getting old & turning into my mother!!!
I don't know about David Attenborough...but having watched the Newsbeat political debate last night specifically aimed at young people's views. Not once did any of the young people consider the wider population, it was all about them. The general consensus that their generation is the most important on the planet and the rest of us are insignificant and a drain on resources! Oh how foolish they are! They wouldn't be where they are had it not been for us and past generations!
Always appreciate your posts logi-baggs. You say so eloquently what I think but don't have the facility to put as clearly as you do. Thanks. 
The main features of humans that animals don't have is their ability to record data and experience for others to consult, to make long-term plans for the future using past records for reference, and to co-operate with others all over the globe to carry out those plans. They can use those abilities for good or for exploitation.
They also have the use of technology that can magnify each person's abilities manyfold, from powered vehicles for transporting stuff by land, sea and air and excavating deep under the sea to tiny portable communications devices.
A swarm of locusts can together devastate a huge area, but one locust on its own doesn't do much damage (and a swarm of locusts is a free restaurant for flocks of hungry birds).
A single human being using tools to extend his own power can do far more than a locust. Multiply that to billions of humans and you have a vast capacity for unthinking destruction (and the only animal predator keeping down human numbers is man).
Thankfully, it has dawned on most people that along with the power to use all the resources on earth, there is also the responsibility to look after them.
It hasn't dawned on everyone, of course, even among the most powerful world leaders. That is why people like David Attenburgh who see so much of the natural world keep plugging how much responsibility humans have.
Brilliantly put Baggs & Jalima , agree wholeheartedly.
Cheers, phoenix. Your comment is appreciated. I do try!
That's a good quote, jalima. My feeling is that if it hadn't been humans who dominated it would have been another or several other species. We did not set about trying to destroy the planet, we set about trying to survive in the most comfortable way possible, as all living things do. Our particular evolution (I recommend a read of Yuval Noah Harari's book, Sapiens for a very readable overview) has meant that we have developed an astonishing array of capabilities that no other animal has yet approached. We are now beginning to really understand the power of our own capabilities, both to create and to destroy, and we are also beginning to deal with destruction and to try to limit it and restore what we have damaged.
Meanwhile, there are a still a lot of people living in abject poverty, from hand to mouth, off rubbish tips. We have to deal with that too. And we will. We are doing. Two hundred years ago nearly everyone lived in abject poverty. The percentage of human population now living in abject poverty is now tiny by comparison.
Homo sapiens, as a species, is no more evil than any other. Nor, I would add, any worse for the planet and for life on the planet than any other. Life will continue whatever we do. What adapts survives. That has always been true even before there were any human species. It's still true now.
Brilliant man, talks a great deal of sense
Jalima we've been to several places in the USA & Canada where the environment has been trashed by industry in the 19th & 20th centuries, but it has been reclaimed and restored. It's possible.
The same is true in Britain - to give just one example, Salford, the archetypal dirty old town, will be home to the new RHS Bridgewater Garden which will bring jobs and money as well as literally breathing new life into the area.
I don't mean to sound complacent and of course we must reduce pollution to a minimum, but it's about sustainability and it's not all doom and gloom.
Some people think because you reach a certain age you should act that age, even if it means depriving yourself of the joy of living. Of course dementia and other illnesses take over. Thinking I'm too old for this and I'm too old for that is the choice too many people make.
I'm with you Jalima
I promise not to slobber although I may put my feet up and snore. 
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.