Gransnet forums

Chat

THAT wedding!

(170 Posts)
MawBroon Sun 21-May-17 08:30:46

Well, what did we think?
Pippa looked beautiful, but how thin is she?
Big sister Kate looked very elegant and competent shushing those little page boys and flower girls. Not stealing the bride's thunder either which was nice. But what WERE those little boys wearing? confused And was little George really giving a 2 fingered salute? Or picking his nose?
Carole looked lovely, clearly pink is the in colour this year, I could wish some of the other guests had got the memo! What a motley crew they were! Including Roger Federer in a lounge suit with a double breasted waistcoat looking as if he had left the rest of his morning dress in the hotel.
Whew, now that's over we can get back to Chelsea Flower Show.
I wonder if the Bucklebury glass "marquee" doubles as a greenhouse? Monty Don, eat your heart out!

Elrel Sun 21-May-17 18:38:38

'Second hand bit of stuff?' - what a unpleasant term for a divorced woman. It sounds like some old buffer in the 1950s!

BlueBelle Sun 21-May-17 18:49:06

I don't suppose Harry s too bothered if you don't like his choice radicalnan She looks a pretty girl and the fact that she kept out of the limelight gives her good brownie points I think ( by the way I m second hand too as are many on here )

Caro1954 Sun 21-May-17 18:52:10

"2nd hand bit of fluff"!!! Applies to lots on here - are they to be denigrated too?! What a sour attitude to a young woman's wedding. People are interested precisely because she IS the future Queen's sister. I wish them every happiness, as I do everybody who was married yesterday.

mumofmadboys Sun 21-May-17 18:57:07

'well worn women make it to the ranks' Oh dear!!!

Iam64 Sun 21-May-17 19:21:47

I was 2nd hand, with a child when I married (happily) for the second time. I was also Very Thin. I could eat whatever I liked and didn't put weight on, sadly that isn't the case any longer.
I saw the photographs on line this morning and was pleased to see a happy, radiant bride. They have pots of money, who am I to put my judgey pants on, moaning that I don't like the Middletons or the Royals, resent the coverage their lives get - then comment on a gransnet thread. Not so disinterested then. smile

Lillie Sun 21-May-17 19:25:28

I thought the wedding looked to be a very happy family occasion. The bride had a lovely smile and her dress was exquisite. The two mothers were very elegant too.
Harry and William kept a low profile, and I think it was right that Harry's gf didn't show up until the evening. The children were cute and well behaved. Nice to have the Norland nanny to help so Grandma Middleton didn't have to take over when Kate and William wanted to mingle.

Grannyben Sun 21-May-17 19:34:44

I think the entire Middleton family conduct themselves extremely well. You never hear Carole (from the council flat incase we didn't know) and her husband making any comments. I think the only time I've actually heard them speak is when they visited the hospital after the birth of Prince George. I also think she also dresses extremely well. Similarly with Pippa, who is often accused of acting like royalty. When does she ever open her mouth or do anything to warrant such comments. Catherine has married into the royal family so they are related to two future kings. Would it be better if they all got jobs cleaning in the local pubs?
I think the wedding looked a beautiful happy occasion. No, i wouldn't have put the little pageboys in those gold pantaloons but then i put my lovely bridesmaid in a puffy emerald green number so who am i to comment

Marmight Sun 21-May-17 19:51:39

I would imagine that the Middletons, especially Mr. would have been perfectly happy just to get on with the wedding without all the hoo ha. Yes, it was OTT but how many other wealthy families have weddings like this which we don't know anything about? Hundreds I should imagine. The press and the public show an indecent interest in anything to do with money, excess, celebrity and royalty and gloat in it. If that's how they want to spend their money, it's their prerogative and who are we to comment? And who are we to comment on who wears what? I think some of the outfits, outrageous as they apparently were to some people, show a bit of individuality and why not wear what you want, so long as it doesn't offend? In my opinion the media interest was excessive in the extreme but that's how it is these days. I think the Middletons conduct themselves very well on the whole, with one or two exceptions, considering being thrust into the limelight and becoming outlaws to the Royals.

storynanny Sun 21-May-17 20:07:22

Pippa's dress was lovely in my opinion.
I think Kate might look at the photo of herself in that ghastly outfit and think "whatever was I thinking off"
Carole Middleton has beautiful slender legs, she looked fabulous.

SueDonim Sun 21-May-17 20:39:41

'Second hand bit of stuff'? 'Well worn women'? Your remarks are disgustingly offensive to all women, Radicalnan. I bet you don't make remarks like that about men. angry

stillaliveandkicking Sun 21-May-17 20:43:51

Skimmed through. It's a wedding. Unless I know the bride and groom personally I don't have any particular feelings about it. I do however wish them happiness.

stillaliveandkicking Sun 21-May-17 20:48:06

Maybe you need to find something else more constructive to do with your time Maw. Very strange post indeed.

MawBroon Sun 21-May-17 21:04:24

What is strange -*SAAK*??
And all the other 61 posts??
confused

MawBroon Sun 21-May-17 21:09:25

Apologies SAAK
I will restrict myself to words of one syllable in future.

mumofmadboys Sun 21-May-17 21:40:53

SAAK if you are not interested don't bother to post. Obviously others are interested as it has generated 65 posts. Each to their own I say.

stillaliveandkicking Sun 21-May-17 21:43:55

I was just saying I wasn't particularly interested in what they wore or who was there etc. I can however post that. so stop swarming smile

stillaliveandkicking Sun 21-May-17 21:45:00

I couldn't personally nit pick about the same things the OP just has either.

stillaliveandkicking Sun 21-May-17 21:47:46

I do however think people that have to post in such a negative way need to get a life smile

MawBroon Sun 21-May-17 21:49:08

No you weren't -SAAK just another piece of gratuitous redness.

stillaliveandkicking Sun 21-May-17 21:49:32

IT was a wedding, people wore what they wanted to or felt fitting for the occasion, they were either slim or not so.. no big deal!

MawBroon Sun 21-May-17 21:50:29

Unlike some, I DO "have a life" hmm

stillaliveandkicking Sun 21-May-17 21:51:53

Whats redness Maw? have no idea what you mean by that, I do however know that the OP was up her bottom.. Was that you Maw?

MawBroon Sun 21-May-17 21:59:28

For "redness" read "rudeness" (perhaps redness if you prefer)
MYOB too

stillaliveandkicking Sun 21-May-17 22:04:54

Not sure what you mean by MYOB. glad you told me what redness meant though.

Let me clarify what I always say on here then.

I don't like people who do what you do. Plain and simple. Its far too hyacinth buck for me.

MawBroon Sun 21-May-17 22:07:06

I don't like people who do what you do. Plain and simple. Its far too hyacinth buck for me

And that is.....? confused