I hated Rome. It was pouring with rain the whole time we were there, but the main reason was the narrow pavements, where you could only walk in single file and then you couldn't admire the architecture because the state of the pavements was so awful you had to watch every step in case you tripped
I shocked my friends by saying I preferred Paris to London - this is mainly because Paris was built for carriages and parades and has wide streets, whilst much of London is still a very medieval layout. That's not to say I don't like London.
So much depends on who you are seeing the place with. Going with my husband really takes the fun out of anywhere - I took him to Amsterdam because I had had such a lovely time there with a group of women from Church, but it just wasn't the same.
We have had weekend breaks in lots of beautiful places within 2-3 hours' drive from us: Augsburg, Regensburg, Frankfurt, Stuttgart. Heidellberg and Strasbourg are wonderful, too, but they are a day's outing from us.
Berlin reallly is fascinating. History in the making, instead of history made 100's of years ago.
We have just come back from a trip which incuded Seville, Ronda, Granada, Cordoba Gibraltar and Malaga. I could have stayed in any of those!
Which city would I go to if I was only allowed one more? Probably London.
If it had to be one I'd never been to: New York.
Wouldn't push off the side of the bed: York, Lincoln.