I'm sorry but I think this sort of talk is alarmist and completely misrepresents the situation in Britain and in particular the claims that England is heading for a "standing room only" situation. You only have to fly over England to see how much open space there is but if you feel that is a simplistic and inaccurate argument - this was reported in The Huffington Post, City AM and other publications in 2013:
"With developers struggling to build enough houses in Britain to keep up with demand, Inside Housing blogger Colin Wiles estimated that England's golf courses take up 270,000 hectares, roughly equating to 2% of its 13.4 million hectares in land area........
"English golf courses use an amount of land that is equivalent to one fifth of England’s total built up area (10% of England is built upon) and could provide at least eight million homes," he wrote.
"Official figures from the UK's National Ecosystem Assessment indicate that around 10% of England's land is classified as urban, with most of it taken up by gardens, parks, roads and lakes. Just 2.27% of that is built upon and only 1.1% of it is used for homes.
There is, of course, the issue of health, education, transport and housing provision which is a concern to everybody. My feeling is that if these basic human needs were treated as a top priority of governments there wouldn't be a problem. People then say, "well, where's the money coming from?"
The Sunday Times Rich List, published in April 2015, shows the richest individuals to be:
Len Blavatnik £13.17 billion
Hinduja Brothers £13 billion
Galen and George Weston £11 billion
Alisher Usmanov £9.8 billion
Lakshmi Mittal £9.2 billion
It was reported that the collective wealth of Britain's richest people has more than doubled in the last ten years. A very different story from that of the average working person.
I don't know what their tax status is or how much tax they pay, but the top rate of tax, regardless of level of wealth, is 45%, the Conservatives having reduced the top rate from 50%.