Gransnet forums

Chat

How much are you worth ?

(107 Posts)
pompa Thu 23-Apr-15 07:20:25

I was announced this morning that Sir Paul McCartney is worth > £700,000,000. Has this bought him contentment? (OK it should help, but has it?)

Give that we are born with nothing and a potful of ashes at the end is of little value, what are we really worth to others ?

pompa Thu 23-Apr-15 18:23:10

Annodomini, perhaps that means that the seeds you sowed and raised have now come to their fullness and it is time for you to reflect on what you achieved, I think that's called enjoying retirement.

Ana Thu 23-Apr-15 18:24:44

Getting a bit bossy now, pompa! hmm

Lona Thu 23-Apr-15 18:24:58

anno if I felt worthless, my mum would say "You've brought up two lovely children!"
No one can take your worth away.

pompa Thu 23-Apr-15 18:26:57

Oh dear, this is going sadly wrong - I intended this as a fun thread.
Time for me to end the thread - if others wish to continue, please do, but I'm off to find another.

merlotgran Thu 23-Apr-15 18:31:40

Blimey! That's us told. hmm

jinglbellsfrocks Thu 23-Apr-15 18:44:27

Lona my kids say that kind of thing to me. It's great. sunshine

AshTree Thu 23-Apr-15 18:57:05

Some people are so poor, all they have is money. (Patrick Meagher, a US radio host who, I suspect, has lots of the stuff...)

annodomini Thu 23-Apr-15 19:25:54

Thanks, Lona and pompa - maybe I was overthinking the matter of worth. I do know how much my sons and their families value me.

Nelliemoser Thu 23-Apr-15 19:56:16

Paul McCartney is "filthy rich" but I think he still seems to live in the real world despite all his money. I think the term I am looking for is he is "grounded."

As for his wealth "The Beatles" created a product which sold very well, is still very enjoyable and still brings in royalties.
Lennon and McCartney were very talented musicians. Their combinations of words and music together still shine out for their quality. That group leaves a big legacy of innovation in popular music. They made people feel good which is an asset to all of us.
They got very rich because of their talent which must count for more than just being born into "old money"

What am I worth? I sometimes wonder. Never having been a big spender I will be able to leave enough to pay for my funeral and a little left for my kids. Unless I end up in a care home.

As for what I might have acheived. It's nothing remarkable or memorable I did just did my job for 40odd yrs.
I don't really feel particularly proud of anything I have ever done. Should I be or am I just having a bad day?

rosesarered Thu 23-Apr-15 20:04:52

Good post Nellymoser.None of us should inflate our own worth in the world.The truth is that not many people would be missed for their 'worth' value anyway, but we would be missed for other things, of what we mean to family and friends.That's the better thing anyway.

TriciaF Thu 23-Apr-15 20:06:19

One reason for the thread going the way it has is because in Discussions of the day it says - Money - does it bring contentment? As in the first sentence of your OP, Pompa.

janeainsworth Thu 23-Apr-15 20:19:14

I'm not sure I'd agree about Lennon & McCartney being exceptionally talented - in the later years anyway of their partnership they owed a great deal to the musicianship of George Martin who arranged their songs and made them what they were from Paul & John's raw ideas. Paul couldn't even read music.

As for the OP, when I saw the title of the thread, I thought we were being asked to disclose the financial value of our assets shock

jinglbellsfrocks Thu 23-Apr-15 20:21:25

He didn't need to read music. He had heart. smile

I think you have to be young to write the songs they did.

janeainsworth Thu 23-Apr-15 20:23:56

I think George was better than either Paul or John, some of the chords he used were amazing.
Paul & John had more obvious sex appeal though, depending on one's taste.

jinglbellsfrocks Thu 23-Apr-15 20:25:55

ja! It's the songs not the sex appeal! shock

Well, these days it is. hmm

henetha Thu 23-Apr-15 20:29:59

Money may not bring contentment but at least you can be miserable in comfort. But seriously, no, I don't think money does bring real lasting contentment.
As for Paul McCartney, I think him and the other Beatles enriched the world with their music. I don't begrudge Paul one single penny of his fortune.

janeainsworth Thu 23-Apr-15 20:31:12

Ha ha jingl speak for yourself grin
Well Paul certainly had more SA 50 years ago than he does now, but I think Mick Jagger & Keith Richards had tons more even back then
;)

jinglbellsfrocks Thu 23-Apr-15 20:35:00

Oh! Mick still has! grin

Penstemmon Thu 23-Apr-15 20:37:28

Paul was for 'lurrve' but Jagger and Jones always top for lust!

jinglbellsfrocks Thu 23-Apr-15 20:40:22

grin

rosesarered Thu 23-Apr-15 20:41:28

In B&Q this afternoon, Get Offa Ma Cloud was belting out, I felt like a teenager again.

janeainsworth Thu 23-Apr-15 21:03:31

Saw a film about the Stones early the other morning while suffering jet lag.
I had forgotten how gorgeous Brian Jones was sad

merlotgran Thu 23-Apr-15 21:13:15

I agree about George Harrison. Apart from the blatant plagiarism of the Chiffon's 'He's So Fine' when he wrote My Sweet Lord, he developed a unique style of his own and was a far better musician.

It was a golden age for pop music.

AshTree Thu 23-Apr-15 21:21:44

Agree totally janea re Jagger, he's always had SA oozing from every pore grin. Paul McCartney was a pretty boy, different kind of SA, but he's lost it completely now.
The ones I always -dribbled- dreamed about was Paul Jones, lead singer with Manfred Mann, and Georgie Fame (yeh, yeh)

AshTree Thu 23-Apr-15 21:23:06

Oh, not enough -- ; should have been dribbled wink