Thanks for the link Alegrias1.
I see there were only a small number of PCR tests taken, and others seem to have been the discredited Lateral Flow Tests. But in the text they claim 72% correct identification, which is at odds with other sources, where efficacy is reckoned to be around 29%.
In the USA, the FDA told authorities to "bin the LFT" because they were unreliable.
On that evidential basis, what store should we set by any statistics that emerge. I guess you choose which source you believe.
Good Morning Saturday 11th July 2026
When you are so incensed and find your inner bravery!


