Thanks for the link Alegrias1.
I see there were only a small number of PCR tests taken, and others seem to have been the discredited Lateral Flow Tests. But in the text they claim 72% correct identification, which is at odds with other sources, where efficacy is reckoned to be around 29%.
In the USA, the FDA told authorities to "bin the LFT" because they were unreliable.
On that evidential basis, what store should we set by any statistics that emerge. I guess you choose which source you believe.
Gransnet forums
AIBU
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »

