So what some of you fail to understand is that the exposure of RB has very neatly knocked the Surgeon survey into the background. So a very obnoxious man is being publicly condemned for the private relationships he had with women, which may or may not have been abusive, some probably were, some probably were not. It may come to court, his career may be ruined.
Meantime some very eminent men, upstanding members of the community who work and treat women every day are quietly ignored for what have been public assaults on the women they were training and worked with. It wasn't women they were involved sexually with. It isn't just one or two women. Its 1 in 3. It should be the subject of huge newspaper reports. It should be headlines. But it isn't. And if you can't connect how that links into how the media and the establishment protect such men, whilst being willing to hang out someone like RB, then you are unaware of how the patriarchy operates.
It isn't whataboutery. It is looking at why and how society works. Because whilst the public is up in arms about RB and his women the surgeons slip quietly away. Yes RB probably is revolting. Yes he has probably behaved badly. But his attitude was obvious and his influence is minimal Unlike that of the male surgeons. Their influence is obvious and widespread. There are still very few women surgeons.