Some animal rights activists are of course revisiting their opposition to hordes and dogs as ‘pets’.
Well, it is a logical progression, isn't it?
If people believed that you shouldn't compete horses because they don't 'consent', why does this not apply to other animals with which people compete?
And does an animal 'consent' to living in a house and being expected to conform to human requirements for their behaviour, or being kept in confinement all day and only exercised on a lead. Or, some cats are never allowed out of the house... Or animals kept in cages?
If horses weren't kept for pleasure and the interest of training, competing and making a relationship with them, they would die out or at least become a rarity. Would this be a good thing?
Likewise, would it be a good thing if the keeping of animals as pets were banned, on the grounds of it being exploitative of the animals and failing to 'respect' them?
Shall we set them free to lead their doggy, catty & horsey lives, fending for themselves as nature intended? 