Gransnet forums

News & politics

Restoring Britain’s health to 2014 levels could add 2% to GDP- i.e. £72 billion

(21 Posts)
valdali Mon 20-Jul-26 13:45:46

I think differentiating between mental health and physical health is absolutely vital here.There is overlap, of course, any chronic pain and things like ME/ CFS are managed much better when someone's in a good place with their mental health.
But the services we need to treat / prevent problems are rather different.
Also employers should be much more flexible on return to work after a severe or long illness - shorter days at first, letting them use priority parking, working in a different place if they've broken their leg, the chance to go out & walk round the block when they feel overwhelmed if it's a mood / emotional problem, and ensuring that everyone else understands that this is not "favouritism" but a way of getting them back to share the workload when they would otherwise still be signed off sick.

There's such a lot that can be done, & it's cheaper than sick pay, benefits the country but most of all, benefits the person who's been ill.

Luckygirl3 Mon 20-Jul-26 10:16:17

Communication, communication, communication ......

I worked for many years in the NHS and this was a problem then. It is even more of a problem now.

I could list endless examples as I know could so many others.

This absence of efficient communication leads to so many ridiculous situations:

- duplicate tests
- long waits for results - I am still waiting for an MRI result a month later and do not even know where it is being sent to chase it up!
- bed blocking - I waited in hospital for a week for an angiogram. They thought I would probably be safe at home with a lifeline, but if I went home I would go off the urgent list and have to wait even longer and they were concerned about that.
- patient deterioration
- lost information

Doodledog Mon 20-Jul-26 10:03:39

I too have been with the same practice for many years (37 or so). The days of having a 'family GP' are long gone, as is being able to see the same one every time, or being able to turn up without an appointment at 11.00am and sit and wait until you could be seen (useful for small children who could go 'up and down' very quickly). I don't know whether they still do home visits, but I doubt it.

On the other hand, the days of having to take time off work to attend a routine appointment are gone too - you can talk to a GP on the phone, or book early or late appointments. Nurses do a lot more of the routine things that used to take GP time, and the surgery now has machines such as ultrasound and X Ray machines, and hospital consultants hold clinics for common conditions such as endocrinology and others. The surgery employs physiotherapists, OTs, radiographers and other support staff, and a pharmacist does annual checks on patients' medication to ensure it is appropriate and up to date. I like being able to book online and summarise the issue for triage, although I understand that that system can be difficult for people who have problems with expressing themselves in text.

I would like to see a review of the relationship between the surgery and hospitals. GPs now refer patients to consultants routinely, and lose sight of progress, as the systems don't communicate. I can see test results on the NHS or surgery apps, but only if they were requested by the GP. If a consultant orders them they stay on the hospital system, to which patients don't have access. As someone who keeps a gimlet eye on my LTCs I want to know what's happening, and if I speak to a GP about it they don't know either. I would prefer to have the GP as 'project manager' of LTCs, as they have an overview of things that may overlap, and hospital departments don't communicate with one another.

IME there have been swings and roundabouts since 2014. I spend a lot more time in outpatients than I used to (not convenient and very time-consuming) and it's frustrating when it's for things like blood tests and US scans that could be done in the surgery. I assume they outsource for budgetary reasons, but the system is not patient-friendly for reasons already mentioned. I would like to speak to a GP who manages my conditions with expert advice when required, and I would very much like to see a much more 'joined up' relationship between hospitals and surgeries.

GrannyGravy13 Mon 20-Jul-26 09:06:20

I can only speak from experience, I have had one bad GP appointment, which I lodged a complaint about and it was upheld.

My last interaction at my surgery was excellent, I was in with the nurse for one hour, and she listened to my concerns and reasons why I did not want to be blue lighted to hospital. I was then with a GP for 30 minutes, who once again listened and agreed I could go home with certain caveats.

I have been with this practice since I was 14 yrs old, there have been many changes over the years, some for the better.

David49 Mon 20-Jul-26 08:55:32

Since Covid there have been big changes locally I havnt seen a GP at all it all done on the phone and if you need to go in for blood tests or vaccinations you see a nurse.

My wife had one potentially serious problem with dropping things and we were not satisfied with the explanation, or the painkillers prescribed, so booked a private consultation. We got an NHS MRI scan and the problem was obvious on our own laptop, it was an old injury, consultant explained she needed to change several activities to reduce pressure on a nerve.

A GP cannot be an expert in everything they do their best with the system they have if we had stuck to the system it would have taken a year to get an expert remedy. It cost £250 to get a definitive diagnosis, not a lot in NHS spending.

petra Mon 20-Jul-26 08:11:43

We are constantly being told that more and more are being treated.
From my own experience listening to friends and family tge reason numbers are going up is because the problem wasn’t treated properly the first/second etc time.

petra Mon 20-Jul-26 08:07:27

I’m beyond rage when it comes to the heinous waste in the NHS. There can’t be one person who either has personal experience or knows someone who has experienced this waste.

A while ago my Dr did an ECG in the surgery. The reading led him to send me to hospital then!
Taken straight in where I was wired up.
I asked what are you doing? An ECG came the answer.
But I’ve just had one 20 minutes ago at my surgery.
Came the answer: we aren’t linked up to your surgery’s system Give me strength 🤬
And on and on it goes. 😥

M0nica Mon 20-Jul-26 07:44:45

LemonJam All told a saving of nearly £2,000 that could have been better spent.

Repeat that many times across the NHS on so many fronts and much of the money needed could be funded from current budgets.

LemonJam Sun 19-Jul-26 18:08:32

For elective planned surgery such as you describe M0nica- cost of your bed per night around £930. If 2 other people could have the bed on the 2 nights you didn't need it and their minor surgery treatment could be delivered in a 24 hour stay that would be a big cost saving.

As you state the issue is streamlined theatre and surgical staff capacity to conduct both minor and major surgery to maximise bed use- 52 weeks a year, even during staff holiday periods.

LemonJam Sun 19-Jul-26 18:00:45

I agree winterwhite 16.49. We can have family line of diagnoses osteoporosis. Knowing that you can do everything possible to promote good bone health- exercise, diet, etc etc- but post menopause change in hormones will heighten your risk- and then you have it....

This principle follows for other LTC- you can take responsibility for your health but that does not mean you won't get things- but may be delay onset.

M0nica Sun 19-Jul-26 18:00:13

Managing the money the NHS has better, would go a long way to dealing with the problems.

I recently went in to hospital for minor day surgery, considered urgent. I was discharged 3 days later because I was on the point of discharging myself,

Why was I there 3 days? no medical reason, but because there was a build up of serious operation and the hospital had no system of feeding short minor ops in between major ops, or having a small ops theatre. I am sure there is a way round ths problem.

They also had a totally inefficient way of dealing with discharge letters. I could have been discharged hours after my op. Instead I was kept in a second night because there was no discharge letter.

I was just admitted to hospital and kept there, occupying beds that could be available for more seriously ill patients, having blood pressure, temperature etc checked every three hours. At least they saved money on feeding me. For most of the time I was in hospital I was nil by mouth.

This is not an aberration. This is the second time this has happened in two different areas of the country for the same minor op - lancing and cleaning out an abscess. 3 days in hospital. How much this cost the NHS I do not know.

LemonJam Sun 19-Jul-26 17:57:09

winterwhite

It is improving health generally and reducing health inequalities among people of working age that is key. If we want more people living longer we have to factor in an increase in the eventual illnesses and disabilities of later old age.

Does the report between physical and mental health?

The Health Foundation report predominantly used Long Term Conditions as its measure for ill health. That could be either Physical or Health- and of course a mixture of the 2.

30% of those in the UK living with a physical LTC also suffer from chronic conditions like depression and anxiety. The health interactions often go both ways. so a need to treat both simultaneously promotes overall well being.

Long term conditions are the biggest reason for not being able to work and for PIP. claims etc

winterwhite Sun 19-Jul-26 16:49:55

Replying to Pamela. No doubt, but we can’t be blamed for hospital waiting lists. It is not our fault if we develop long-term conditions. These things will strike however saintly our diets or rigorous or exercise. And there are many for whom life is such a struggle that they have no space for advice.

PamelaJ1 Sun 19-Jul-26 16:31:36

I can’t help thinking that we could be a little more responsible for ourselves!
Of course there are things that we can’t be blamed for eg. my DH has pulmonary fibrosis caused by the chemicals used during his farming career, before it was realised that respiratory aids were needed.
He should however be aware of the things he needs to do to make his life easier.
Luckily he has me to keep him on the straight and narrow😂.
I think everyone should know and have access to the information that is out there but, unfortunately, that doesn’t seem to be the case.
I’m not sure how the message gets through, I hear it loudly enough but many don’t.

winterwhite Sun 19-Jul-26 16:12:51

It is improving health generally and reducing health inequalities among people of working age that is key. If we want more people living longer we have to factor in an increase in the eventual illnesses and disabilities of later old age.

Does the report between physical and mental health?

LemonJam Sun 19-Jul-26 14:55:15

Healthy life expectancy and mortality rates are falling in the UK, one of only 5 countries in the world's 21 richest countries with a falling rate.

nanna8 Sun 19-Jul-26 13:28:10

Population growth maybe ? I think if people have to wait a long time to get medical help some will just not be bothered. It is happening here as well. If you are ill the last thing you want is long boring queues. I don’t think we are affected in quite the same way here, though because the life expectancy seems to be going up ( quality of life is another issue )

LemonJam Sun 19-Jul-26 11:34:27

Thanks for the link Petra 👍

I agree Ilovecheese that investing in reducing the NHS waiting list asap would help. Health deteriorates during the long waits.

In tandem a big surge investment in reducing waiting times for diagnostics would similarly help People are in fact on 2 waiting lists:
1) waiting times for various diagnostic procedures. The GP can order a routine or an urgent referral- but as yet the symptoms cause is likely unknown so most referrals are marked routine- unless the patient has suspected cancer symptoms
2) After one diagnostic referral wait, the result, eg from a dexa scan could show osteoporosis but also highlight another issue of concern that requires ultra sound scan
3) The USS wait could be a further 6-7 month wait
4) Meanwhile the patient's associated symptoms may have deteriorated, further symptoms have emerged and further diagnostic tests needed.
5) whilst waiting for further diagnostic tests- some have 9 month waits- the patient may go an a. surgical waiting list but the patient's health keeps deteriorating because some symptoms are yet to be diagsnosed and treated.

BOTH surgery and diagnostic waiting lists need urgent investment

Ilovecheese Sun 19-Jul-26 11:13:26

I suppose perhaps the only thing that could improve things quickly is reducing the waiting list for operations that could restore health and possibly the ability to work. I am thinking of things like hip or knee replacements or heart bypass.
Longer term is about reducing poverty and encouraging more healthy lifestyles.
One problem with that though, is that if a person is working long hours for minimum income, a healthy lifestyle is a bit of an impossible dream, no time for exercise, no money for healthier food.
The higher minimum wage might possibly help, but not if it just reduces universal credit.

petra Sun 19-Jul-26 11:09:51

This was a very interesting informative listen.

www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m002phn1

LemonJam Sun 19-Jul-26 11:00:13

The Health Foundation argues health is an economic asset and improving it could generate £72bn for public finances Restoring the deteriorating health of the UK’s population to the level of 2014 would boost GDP by 2% and generate a £72bn dividend for the public finances, research suggests.

A paper by the Health Foundation thinktank, published today
, argues the nation’s health should be valued by policymakers as an economic asset.

“Good health enables people to live well for longer and contribute to their communities, helping to build a stronger society. A healthy labour force is also the engine that powers our economy – it determines whether people can participate in employment, how effectively they work and how long they remain in the labour market,” the authors say.

They calculate that healthy life expectancy actually fell by two years in the decade to 2022-24 – with the UK one of only five of the world’s 21 richest countries to see a deterioration.

Over the same period, the number of working-age people with a long-term health condition in the UK increased from 11.7 million to 15.7 million. The report also points to stark inequalities, with people living in the richest 10% of areas likely to see as many as 20 more years of living in good health, compared with the poorest 10%

Rising ill health adds to NHS spending and the cost for disability benefits, but the Health Foundation points out that the costs also include the tax revenue and economic output lost when sickness prevents people from working.