I think that is just the conversation the OP intended to set running. My problem was, as still is, that the headline is incorrect.
"Figures such as Jane Austen and Winston Churchill are to be axed from our banknotes" They are not being "axed". These pictures are regularly changed taking a different topic each time.
"as they are apparently elitist and divisive and not fitting with our natural and cultural diversity.". I've no idea where this idea originated nor does the OP enlighten us. It appears to be an opinion the OP wants to look as if it been said by the current government - but (and I'm happy to admit I may have missed it) nowhere is the implication that this is government policy confirmed.
"It is decisions this that push people towards Reform and Restore[sic]." Not people who find out the truth and come to conclusions based on that. Those who read online content featuring sensationalised or misleading headlines may well be already attracted to these parties or they may find inaccurate but loud attracts them to these far-right* parties. I don't think anyone is being pushed.
"When is all this nonsense going to stop?" When people find out the truth for themselves, I guess.
*far-right - I know some complain about the two parties mentioned be called "far-right" so I checked if it was a reasonable thing to do.
Yes, it is considered reasonable by many political scientists, commentators, and organisations to describe both Reform UK and Restore Britain as "far-right" or "radical right," though they are often framed differently depending on the source.
Reform UK: Often labeled as a right-wing populist and radical-right party.
Restore Britain: Led by former Reform MP Rupert Lowe, this breakaway party is widely characterized as being further to the right of Reform.