News blackout on Old Bailey Starmer arson case.

Casdon

I would not trust George Galloway to take the dog out if he was already outside.

And anyone who gets their news from X needs to give their head a wobble.

Chestnut

Casdon

I would not trust George Galloway to take the dog out if he was already outside.

And anyone who gets their news from X needs to give their head a wobble.

I don’t do X but it’s everywhere else.

We all know it will all be a whitewash.

I suspect it is related to a case that Starmer dealt with in 2003 as a barrister, representing asylum seekers.

It can’t be found as it has been blocked.

Whitewavemark2

I suspect it is related to a case that Starmer dealt with in 2003 as a barrister, representing asylum seekers.

It can’t be found as it has been blocked.

If that’s all it is, why has it been blocked?
Another case in the same court has been reported about, ‘apparently’!
All very strange!

If it had have been about a case in 2003, would that have not made this lads about five at the time? 😂

MT62

If it had have been about a case in 2003, would that have not made this lads about five at the time? 😂

Wwm2

MT62

Whitewavemark2

I suspect it is related to a case that Starmer dealt with in 2003 as a barrister, representing asylum seekers.

It can’t be found as it has been blocked.

If that’s all it is, why has it been blocked?
Another case in the same court has been reported about, ‘apparently’!
All very strange!

Well we don’t know do we! That is the point.

Primrose53

Chestnut

Casdon

I would not trust George Galloway to take the dog out if he was already outside.

And anyone who gets their news from X needs to give their head a wobble.

I don’t do X but it’s everywhere else.

We all know it will all be a whitewash.

What do you mean Primrose53, are you saying that the judge and jury are corrupt?

Casdon

I would not trust George Galloway to take the dog out if he was already outside.

Quite!

MT62

MT62

If it had have been about a case in 2003, would that have not made this lads about five at the time? 😂

Wwm2

I have no idea , and it is only a guess on my part, because the case involved Ukrainian male models.

The alleged attacks were last year.

Two of the men appeared via video link at the Old Bailey from HMP Belmarsh last October.

As reported by the BBC:

www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5ypmenlzddo

Sky News latest:

news.sky.com/story/keir-starmer-arson-trial-three-men-accused-of-fire-attacks-at-homes-linked-to-prime-minister-13537908

No blackout, just nothing to see here at the moment!

So what is this thread about then?

This for information. AI

Blocks on reporting court cases involving a UK Prime Minister typically occur to protect national security, prevent prejudice in active proceedings (contempt of court), or safeguard the administration of justice. Such restrictions ensure a fair trial, protect witness identities, or prevent public disclosure of sensitive information, rather than specifically protecting the Prime Minister.

If there is blocking, my guess would be state security.

I expect it all be Starmer’s fault, I expect the judge and jury will be corrupt and cover up all his wrong doings.

It’s like some of you simply cannot wait for more of what you call “sleaze” to surround our current PM, who by all accounts is the most hated PM since time began and can never ever get anything right.

And of course there is the small matter of an independent judicial system.

Whitewavemark2

And of course there is the small matter of an independent judicial system.

Errrr sadly for some of you, our PM is not on trial, so why should there be an issue?

Cossy

I expect it all be Starmer’s fault, I expect the judge and jury will be corrupt and cover up all his wrong doings.

It’s like some of you simply cannot wait for more of what you call “sleaze” to surround our current PM, who by all accounts is the most hated PM since time began and can never ever get anything right.

Well the same can be said of you labour supporters getting your claws into other party leaders- if the shoe is on the other foot so to speak, you would have plenty to harp on about.

Tbh, there are more pressing issues going on in the world than this 🙄

If you say so, MT62, I respectfully disagree.

MT62

Cossy

I expect it all be Starmer’s fault, I expect the judge and jury will be corrupt and cover up all his wrong doings.

It’s like some of you simply cannot wait for more of what you call “sleaze” to surround our current PM, who by all accounts is the most hated PM since time began and can never ever get anything right.

Well the same can be said of you labour supporters getting your claws into other party leaders- if the shoe is on the other foot so to speak, you would have plenty to harp on about.

I think the majority of us, whoever we support politically are mature enough to differentiate between judicial and political issues actually.

Cossy

If you say so, MT62, I respectfully disagree.

Maybe not you Cossy but there has been plenty of nasty comments on other party leaders over the years.

I don’t care for Labour or KS, but no one deserves to have their homes, or belongings destroyed whatever the circumstances.