And Starmer is a prime target given that he’s always worked towards repairing our broken relationship with Europe. So who is going to gain by having Starmer removed from office?
Starmer is working, of his own volition, to repair what he considers to be a broken relationship with Europe. A democratic referendum decided that Britain wished to leave the EU, and more importantly , resented the imposition of the ECHR above the Supreme Court. But since Starmer's arrival decisions are being delayed , for example, the clear directive about single sex lavatories for trans people; the delay on grooming gangs inquiry, the lack of a defence strategy and budget, etc etc, the failure to do anything about illegal migrants other than pay money hand over fist to Macron, who then lectures him about how woefully Britain is doing.
Worst of all, the Legacy Bill is being repealed, enthusiastically led by Starmer and Hermer, the suggesting being that it is done to appease the Irish government as a means of entry to Europe. This will enable human rights lawyers to prosecute veterans as the present system is 'incompatible with the European Convention of Human Rights.' Senior members of the military are appalled, saying that it will leave soldiers open to harassment by 'money-grabbing lawyers in a legal cycle that can last for years. Witness the fraudulent Phil Shiner who was prosecuted for illegal practices but somehow evaded his prison sentence; and never forget who worked for him, pro bono, Starmer and Hermer who are both 'fanatical human rights lawyers.'
They need vetting as much as Mandelson.
