GrannyGravy13
Doodledog
What has marrying (a personal matter which impacts only on those concerned) to do with voting? People always bring it up when anything to do with age is mentioned. That and joining the forces. Apples and oranges.
18 is the age of majority. Before that age people are minors with limited responsibility in law. If posters want marriage at 16 to be disallowed they should focus on that, not assume that it means that 16 year olds are therefore adults- they are not. Anyway, I thought marriageable age was now 18? Whether is is 16, 18 or 37 is till irrelevant to voting age though.
I can only speak for myself , I think that there should be one age where people are legally recognised as an adult for purposes such as voting, fighting for your country (you can join the forces at 17 but cannot go into a war situation until 18) marrying and purchasing alcohol.
That makes sense, but it's still the case that we don't have that, and saying that because someone may legally do one thing should mean they are allowed to do another just doesn't.
For one thing, why assume that the age should move down, rather than up? Things are decided on an individual basis, so a universal age won't always be the best way. I assume that allowing marriage at 16 was because that is the age of consent, and allowing sex but not marriage under law would have been seen as immoral. Driving at 17 means you might have passed a test by the age of 18, so are legal on the roads, and so on. There are arguments for not allowing the sale of alcohol to under 25s, and in the US I think the age is 21 - or does that depend on the state? Anyway, my point is that these things are subjective, and one size doesn't always fit all.