Gransnet forums

News & politics

Trump says our troops were not on the frontline in Afghanistan

(129 Posts)
eddiecat78 Fri 23-Jan-26 09:36:48

How dare this bufoon make such a claim?! My Royal Marine son still has nightmares about his time there. He saw one friend killed by gunfire and watched another lose a leg by an ied. I want Trump to face Veterans and explain how they got wounded if they were just in the background.
Why do so many Americans believe a word this excuse for a man says?

foxie48 Sun 25-Jan-26 20:45:56

He didn't apologise he just made a different statement that contradicted what he'd previously said. Classic Trump!

Oreo Sun 25-Jan-26 13:58:48

I think what he said about troops in Afghanistan was a mix of hubris about Greenland and the fact that he comes out with all sorts of things at times, probably something he heard someone once say about the troops there, being both lazy and ignorant about many foreign (to him) affairs.
At least there was a sort of apology but what about an apology of sorts for the rest of the countries who lost servicemen too?

Basgetti Sun 25-Jan-26 13:40:17

Interesting, Wyllow. Not keen on Quentin Letts at all but he made a similar point on Any Questions on Friday, likening Trump’s mental state to Charlemagne and Henry VIII, amongst others. Husband and I had a conversation earlier that day where we came to a similar conclusion, thinking of Nero and Genghis Khan (though at least Khan wasn’t a draft-dodger).

I agree with a poster upthread. A full, honest psychological report would make for very interesting reading.

Of course, that will never be allowed. No doubt, like his medical reports, it will be the greatest psychological profile, ever. The best.

Coolgran65 Sat 24-Jan-26 12:46:18

I am so angry at Trump's comments. One of our AC did a tour of Afghanistan followed by a tour in Iraq. He came home in one piece but the mental trauma still lingers.
Each time I try to express how I feel about Trump i just cannot find the words.

Wyllow3 Sat 24-Jan-26 12:36:48

Allira

Perhaps he's not quite as stupid as he appears; coming out with one outrageous statement after another means people are incensed about his current pronouncement and the last one is put on the back burner.

Whatever next?

exactly.

Except I don't think he can sort of stop himself, ie it isnt planned

which does make him the more dangerous in one way: in another, eventually I do believe that there will be those within his own party who will want rid.

Not that I particularly want to see Vance....

I had a very interesting discussion with a political analyst yesterday who believes that:

far from building a new Empire, Trump is like one of the late Roman Caesars, who were ever more crazy in the face of a Failing Empire.

Its heyday has passed in the face of the likes of China and its satellites and its growth into Africa and so on by economic not military means (but they have a very effective army).

In the face of this Europe has more reason than ever to stand together or we'll get pulled under in the vortex. Canada remains a very, very important ally but will struggle if the US starts to disintintegrate.

Norah Sat 24-Jan-26 12:28:07

POTUS makes absurd comments on social media.

“Maybe we should have put NATO to the test: Invoked Article 5, and forced NATO to come here and protect our Southern Border from further Invasions of Illegal Immigrants, thus freeing up large numbers of Border Patrol Agents for other tasks.” - President Donald J. Trump

Allira Sat 24-Jan-26 12:19:57

ronib

I’m thinking that Trump has deliberately set out from the very beginning of his presidency to break the financial bonds which tied the USA to Europe.
I can almost sympathise with that position, if it’s true. So more ridiculous statements from Trump about the poor involvement of British troops in Afghanistan seem to further emphasise that the USA wants out of the current deal/set up. So in a way, it makes sense possibly? Truth, of course, being bypassed entirely.

Could be, and was threatening Canada and Greenland part of his plan or is he turning on his NATO allies because they stood up to him regarding some of his preposterous intentions?

Who knows how his mind works? Or is it all part of some plan by others who are pulling his strings?

DaisyAnneReturns Sat 24-Jan-26 12:13:51

ronib

I’m thinking that Trump has deliberately set out from the very beginning of his presidency to break the financial bonds which tied the USA to Europe.
I can almost sympathise with that position, if it’s true. So more ridiculous statements from Trump about the poor involvement of British troops in Afghanistan seem to further emphasise that the USA wants out of the current deal/set up. So in a way, it makes sense possibly? Truth, of course, being bypassed entirely.

You're right. Altternative facts used to balance with real facts but Trump now has a very efficient propoganda model. He has written his version of what happened at Davos and Fox News is repeating it. So they are being told that America owned Greenland, that the Chinese make but don't use windmills. They are being told that their 401K retirement funds have risen between 80-90% in some cases by 100%. The truth, which the most watched "news" stations will not tell them is that the average increase has been 9.6%. There are no facts.

Those around him did not try to conceal there hostility towards Mark Carney and towards European Government's in Davos this week. And still the far-right outlets tell America that the Donal Trump is the greatest President ever, while "blue states" are being crushed by the ICE Gestapo.

But remember this doesn't just happen in America. People listen to, praise and vote for politicians here and in Europe, who would happily behave in the same way.

Cumbrianmale56 Sat 24-Jan-26 12:07:15

Trump was terrible towards the former Presidential candidate John Mc Cain, who was shot down over Vietnam and was a prisoner for 5 years. Typically Trump made the tactless comment that he would have thought more of Mc Cain if he had escaped. Not exactly easy for a white man in an American uniform to escape from Hanoi, I would think.

Allira Sat 24-Jan-26 11:56:52

Mamie

I do think though, that some of the American military will be angry. Many of the people who served shoulder to shoulder with troops from the UK and elsewhere will be pretty senior now. They will be in a position of influence.

FB is awash with long and articulate posts from angry service and ex-service personnel, not just those in the UK, other NATO members too.

He seems to lob one grenade after another indiscriminately (or deliberately, who knows?).

Allira Sat 24-Jan-26 11:53:57

Maremia

Yes, Allira, the 'dead cat on the table' ploy.
But, as long as competent folk are keeping tabs, securing 'evidence', about each and every transgression, then much of his nonsense could be revoked/ reversed, in due course, with due process.

I expect that is happening.

Whatever diversionary tactics he uses, it still affects those damaged by his previous outbursts.

Cumbrianmale56 Sat 24-Jan-26 11:49:56

mae13

Trump should talk!

As I asked, in another post, was this creature disappointed and heartbroken when his rich Daddy's money greased enough palms to get him exempted from the Vietnam War draft?

Trump managed to get five exemptions from the draft and ensured his exemptions would last past his 25th birthday, when he would be too old to be called up. He even made a tasteless joke about not being drafted, saying catching STIs in expensive nightclubs was a bigger risk to him than being sent to Vietnam.
I'm sure had Trump been drafted, and not been too keen on being killed, he could have decided to sign on for 3 years in a non combat role as many men did during the Vietnam Wat.

Maremia Sat 24-Jan-26 11:41:57

And Epstein is still 'on the table'.

Maremia Sat 24-Jan-26 11:41:01

Yes, Allira, the 'dead cat on the table' ploy.
But, as long as competent folk are keeping tabs, securing 'evidence', about each and every transgression, then much of his nonsense could be revoked/ reversed, in due course, with due process.

foxie48 Sat 24-Jan-26 11:40:32

Ronib when Trump says European countries need to step up and take more responsibility for their protection, I don't think anyone disagrees. However, it is the way that Trump is behaving towards long time allies that people, quite rightly, object to. European countries are increasing their military spending and the US benefits greatly from this. He doesn't need to lie, insult or publicly humiliate countries or their leaders but that is what he enjoys doing because he's a pathetic bully with severe mental health issues. He also needs to acknowledge the number of jobs Nato defence spending supports in the US and the extent to which it makes US armaments cheaper for their own military.

"Total defense investment for European Allies and Canada exceeded USD 482 billion in 2024. The U.S. remains the dominant supplier, providing 52% of equipment for European NATO members. " AI generated

Mamie Sat 24-Jan-26 11:40:32

ronib

I’m thinking that Trump has deliberately set out from the very beginning of his presidency to break the financial bonds which tied the USA to Europe.
I can almost sympathise with that position, if it’s true. So more ridiculous statements from Trump about the poor involvement of British troops in Afghanistan seem to further emphasise that the USA wants out of the current deal/set up. So in a way, it makes sense possibly? Truth, of course, being bypassed entirely.

I think most of what he spouting at the moment is performative bullying. Plus distraction from Epstein.

Mamie Sat 24-Jan-26 11:29:58

I do think though, that some of the American military will be angry. Many of the people who served shoulder to shoulder with troops from the UK and elsewhere will be pretty senior now. They will be in a position of influence.

Allira Sat 24-Jan-26 11:27:44

Perhaps he's not quite as stupid as he appears; coming out with one outrageous statement after another means people are incensed about his current pronouncement and the last one is put on the back burner.

Whatever next?

Wyllow3 Sat 24-Jan-26 11:22:27

We are seeing it from the POV of those attacked, of course.

but Trump is also saying it for the home market

There are plenty of voters who won't know enough history and current affairs to know who the US's allies were and the significant part they played.

Trump is on a glorifying mission to big up himself - and also to take US minds off the parlous situation as regards health, welfare, justice, at home

Its a classic way to act as a dictator to unite your own people by setting up enemies or others weaker/lesser/unreliable than "us

Mackir Sat 24-Jan-26 11:18:19

A formal apology is necessary, from the habitual liar.

ronib Sat 24-Jan-26 10:59:22

I’m thinking that Trump has deliberately set out from the very beginning of his presidency to break the financial bonds which tied the USA to Europe.
I can almost sympathise with that position, if it’s true. So more ridiculous statements from Trump about the poor involvement of British troops in Afghanistan seem to further emphasise that the USA wants out of the current deal/set up. So in a way, it makes sense possibly? Truth, of course, being bypassed entirely.

Allira Sat 24-Jan-26 10:43:52

Bullies are often cowards too.

keepcalmandcavachon Sat 24-Jan-26 10:41:13

Just heard him on the BBC news referred to as The Coward of Capitol Hill. Hope it sticks. In his craw.

Fallingstar Sat 24-Jan-26 10:28:01

Trump is a draft dodging coward who wouldn’t have lasted a second on the frontline in the Helmand province of Afghanistan.
He should retract his foul lies and apologise wholeheartedly to the armed services in the UK who served alongside the US in Afghanistan and to the loved ones of those UK soldiers who made the ultimate sacrifice.
But I suppose a coward would never do this.

AGAA4 Sat 24-Jan-26 10:19:02

I greatly admire a soldier who lost both his legs aiding the US. He said 'whatever this guy sitting in the Whitehouse says, I know I was there and that I was on the front line.'