NanaDana
Kuensberg was reporting the results of research carried out by the King's Fund, according to which the public gave the NHS its worst rating since records began 40 years ago. Only 29% of those surveyed said they were satisfied with the NHS. However, 90% still agreed that the service should be free and available to everyone. I feel that where quality and availability of NHS service is concerned, it's a bit of a postcode lottery. In the case of DH and I, we're among the lucky ones, and are happy with what we've experienced here on Tyneside. It's no exaggeration to say that neither of us would be here today without it. Yes, it's badly underfunded and under-resourced, and I'd gladly pay more tax if I could be assured that it would go directly into NHS coffers.
Last year I had a lung tumour discovered early and treated. This probably extended my life, giving me a better chance of long term survival. I was treated with care and dignity by all the staff involved. I too live on Tyneside.
IMO, it’s been underfunded for years. What is more the operating systems are subject to change, hoping the system will improve for us and the medical staff. This rarely happens. What is needed is joined up writing, not each authority going in its own direction. It boils down to poor senior management or lack of this precious resource. As these senior managers seem to be paid extortionate amount for no good reason. There needs to be far more listening to the staff who actually do the work.
I still pay a small amount of tax but I’d be very happy to pay more into health, education, social care and utilities if services were vastly improved. We’ve lived for far too long being told that low taxes are best. The result is many privatised once public services that don’t work and still public services that are falling apart.


