Yes it has. Strange that Johnson handed over unredacted items to the Cabinet Office. I suppose he could blame them if redacted items are handed over to the inquiry by the CO.
Yes it has. Strange that Johnson handed over unredacted items to the Cabinet Office. I suppose he could blame them if redacted items are handed over to the inquiry by the CO.
Oh! I can’t find that information. The BBC are still reporting that it hasn’t been handed over - their news app. Site.
Slight diversion, but I just read the BBC article. No decision yet according to them, as you say, Something is going on with Boris’ forehead, he’s either got really nasty bruises or the imprint of his sunglasses, I can’t work it out.
It’s adding fuel to the flames to wait until after the deadline has passed, when the PM could have said much earlier that was the intended action of the government and the rationale. Now everybody thinks there are things that have to be hidden.
Sunak truly is a very poor politician - all his done by this decision is convinced everyone the government has something(s) to hose, whether it’s true or not.
I will admit he was put in a slightly tricky position by the very wide remit given to the Public Enquiry, but he was, presumably, part of the decision making process for that.
“Dear Cabinet Office Our lives were in your hands. Whatever you're hiding was a matter of life and death to us. Some of us were lucky to survive. Many did not. We're entitled to know why. Every little bit of it. Michael Rosen”
“The Cabinet Office members Rishi Sunak Oliver Dowden Jeremy Quinn Baroness Neville Alex Burghat Johnny Mercer Penny Mordaunt Lord True Early Howe and the dodgy head of the civil service Simon Case These people are denying the UK the truth about their management of covid”
It may not be the truth about their management of covid that’s so inflammatory, assuming that is the reason they want a judicial review. It may expose unprofessional behaviour at a more profound level.
It may not be the truth about their management of covid that’s so inflammatory, assuming that is the reason they want a judicial review. It may expose unprofessional behaviour at a more profound level.
Johnson’s WhatsApps apparently don’t include anything before May 2021, because, according to the Guardian
“he had changed phones after it emerged his number had been listed online, and that he was given security advice to not turn on the old device again. Johnson was thus unable to see the earlier messages, but he was happy to pass the phone to the inquiry if needed”
I’d lay a bet it won’t be the headline, the headline will probably be the Labour MP allegedly taking prostitutes to the Commons, which is bad, but not quite in the same league.