Gransnet forums

News & politics

the law as it stands on sex - part 3

(338 Posts)
Doodledog Sat 23-Apr-22 09:11:32

Two thousand posts so far!

To pick up where we left off, I’ll repeat my post from the end of the last thread - I got home too late to get any answers or many comments. I’ll keep the formatting to make it easier to bold, but will lost the bold type or italics:

I’ve been out this evening, so am just catching up with the thread, and have a few questions, if that’s ok.

trisher, you seem to find a lot of this funny, but I don’t see it like that at all.

What was the point of the ‘spot the transwoman’ game?

As Galaxy says, you are quick to label others, and I wouldn’t have thought being called an ‘ally’ would have struck you as offensive, but if you don’t like it I will try to remember not to use it in relation to you. Perhaps you would remember that many people on here (me included) find ‘cis’ offensive, and would return the favour?

I also see myself as someone who believes in human rights and equality. I posted the Amnesty list of human rights on this very thread, after VS insisted that the human rights of transpeople were being abused. I asked which ones were being denied, but there was no response from either of you.

Human rights are very important to me, but I really don’t think that being allowed to undress in front of the opposite sex is a human right, and can’t see anything on the Amnesty list that is being denied to transpeople. If you think otherwise, please state which ones they are, and I’ll reconsider.

VS, You say:
Thats exactly what was said any time anyone asked for their rights... Others complained it violated theirs. It didn't and it doesn't
Can you please explain what you mean by that? I see it trotted out a lot, but nobody who repeats it has explained how it relates to the following situations:
Where there are people whose rights to undress in a single sex environment is violated by people asking for the right to use that environment as members of the opposite sex.

Where people want the right to compete fairly in a sport that they have trained for for years, but that right is violated by those who have stronger and differently proportioned bodies insisting on competing against them.

When people want the right to have agency over who touches them intimately but that right is violated by someone who does not declare their male sex to female patients/clients.

I would be interested to hear your thoughts, as I do see those things as violations of the rights of one group of people by another.

Also, what is it that you think that legislation has dealt with fairly, please?

kjmpde Tue 26-Apr-22 22:31:27

not really an answer but I used to go to a car boot where one of the traders was previously a man. It was in a small village and yet nobody blinked. Obviously was a male at birth and now dressed as a woman- smashing legs. nobody appeared to be bothered . I also worked with a woman - may have been a man before (as suggested by my colleagues). I had no problems with the preferred new gender. I've never known a woman wanting to be a man. I was aware of a surgeon in the Leicester area who was held to be responsible for terrible issues after surgery - constant urination and other issues.

Chewbacca Tue 26-Apr-22 22:44:28

A transgender Rikers Island inmate with previous arrests for assault raped a female prisoner after she finished showering in the women's section of the violence-plagued New York City facility.

Ramel Blount, 33, who goes by the name Diamond Blount, pleaded guilty to the sexual attack in a deal on April 7, the Bronx District Attorney's Office announced Monday.
The 33-year-old victim, whose name was not released, had just finished showering when Blount approached her from behind, held her down by the back of her neck and raped her at the Rose M. Singer center on February 8.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10755219/Transgender-Rikers-inmate-incarcerated-assault-housed-womens-wing-RAPES-female-inmate.html

Doodledog Tue 26-Apr-22 22:46:35

I don't think that anyone (on here at any rate) would bat an eyelid at someone who 'lived as' a woman but was born a man. What we are saying is that they are transwomen, not women.

They are also very different from men who simply say that they are women, in order to gain access to women that they wouldn't otherwise have. It is that 'self id' that has caused the problems. For transwomen such as you describe as well as for women.

Chewbacca Tue 26-Apr-22 22:46:50

These incredibly rare occurrences are coming thick and fast aren't they FarNorth?

Doodledog Tue 26-Apr-22 22:47:26

Sorry = my post was to kjmpde.

Mollygo Tue 26-Apr-22 23:11:03

Chewbacca

These incredibly rare occurrences are coming thick and fast aren't they FarNorth?

Yes and more people are willing to talk about them and risk being shouted down as transphobic.
Of course, we could be reading posts about what males like Tim Westwood have been accused of, as a reason for not saying TW attacks are appalling. I’m relieved we’re not.

I was going to reply to kjmpde, but Doodledog has said all I wanted to say.

FarNorth Wed 27-Apr-22 03:32:58

I'm a bit confused by the reference to Tim Westwood.
Do you mean we could be saying that men are going to find ways to assault women whatever we do and we're being silly to worry about self-id ?

FarNorth Wed 27-Apr-22 03:51:16

That is a very good article from Legal Feminist.

Madgran77 Wed 27-Apr-22 07:01:28

Chewbacca

These incredibly rare occurrences are coming thick and fast aren't they FarNorth?

And it doesn't matter how many there are really, the fact is the only reason they can happen is because of the placement of a male born prisoner now identifying as a woman, still with a man's strength and body , with convictions for assault, has been put in a woman's prison!!

Mollygo Wed 27-Apr-22 07:56:53

FarNorth

I'm a bit confused by the reference to Tim Westwood.
Do you mean we could be saying that men are going to find ways to assault women whatever we do and we're being silly to worry about self-id ?

No, but actions like that, by someone who is male have been used on GN as an argument that “men attack women and women attack women so it’s unfair to focus on TW who attack women”.
It’s not a good defence, but it has been used on more than one occasion.

Chewbacca Wed 27-Apr-22 08:57:16

Correct Doodledog; as has the "women do terrible things to each other in prisons as well you know!" That's true. So why put a male in with them so that he can do more?

FarNorth Wed 27-Apr-22 09:02:22

Thanks Mollygo.

FarNorth Wed 27-Apr-22 09:08:20

A friend has said to me that the statistics for male crimes mean nothing.
They compare them to higher figures for crime by black people and ask if that means I'd support restrictions on black people.

Chewbacca Wed 27-Apr-22 09:41:27

Good ole whataboutery FarNorth!

Doodledog Wed 27-Apr-22 11:23:36

Why do people trying to make an untenable case always compare it to something emotive and unconscionable such as racism? We've had it on here when we've complained about men competing in women's sports - because a small number of black athletes have been affected by sex anomalies anyone questioning allowing transwomen to compete as women is accused of being racist. It's like they've all been sent a cribsheet of standard responses to criticisms of their ideology.

FarNorth Wed 27-Apr-22 12:12:20

It's unfortunate for them that it doesn't make sense so they have to cast around for whatever they can find to cling to.

Smileless2012 Wed 27-Apr-22 12:34:47

Because their arguments are weak Doodledog, if they can't shut us up with accusations of trans phobic they play the racist cardangry.

FarNorth Wed 27-Apr-22 12:38:24

That reminds me, this thread hasn't been deleted yet. Do you think we can all stop worrying about that now?

Smileless2012 Wed 27-Apr-22 12:47:34

I stopped worrying about it on page 1 FarNorth.

Doodledog Wed 27-Apr-22 12:48:17

There was never any reason why it should have been deleted. It is not uncommon for threads to run to more than one part - deleting this would surely have meant deleting them, too. As for naming people in a post - what difference does it make if that post opens one thread or ends the previous one?

I can't help thinking that the 'spot the transwoman' game didn't go the way it was intended (whatever that was), but as it was conveniently at the end of a thread, it was hoped that the game would die with it. Similarly, the 'nobody's rights are violated' thing was shown to be nonsense, so rather than attempt to defend it, getting the thread pulled would have been an easier option, as well as an opportunity to show righteous indignation that pesky women have dared to question the rights of men to enter our spaces.

FarNorth Wed 27-Apr-22 14:04:22

Chewbacca

^A transgender Rikers Island inmate with previous arrests for assault raped a female prisoner after she finished showering in the women's section of the violence-plagued New York City facility.^

Ramel Blount, 33, who goes by the name Diamond Blount, pleaded guilty to the sexual attack in a deal on April 7, the Bronx District Attorney's Office announced Monday.
The 33-year-old victim, whose name was not released, had just finished showering when Blount approached her from behind, held her down by the back of her neck and raped her at the Rose M. Singer center on February 8.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10755219/Transgender-Rikers-inmate-incarcerated-assault-housed-womens-wing-RAPES-female-inmate.html

I missed this post earlier.

I used to think "It'll take something horrific happening to a woman to get things changed."
But it seems even that makes no difference as we see the increasingly frequent 'rare occurrences '.

This can't possibly be framed as anything other than a violent attack by a male.

Doodledog Wed 27-Apr-22 14:17:56

I think that women mean so little to many TRAs - we are not male, we haven't even bothered to 'transition' to become weaker males, that we just don't count.

In the Brave New World there are men and transwomen at the top, then transmen, then menstruaters/breeders/cervix havers, who are only good for bringing forth the next generation.

If women did matter, we would have been listened to before now.

DiamondLily Wed 27-Apr-22 14:19:46

They've tried homophobia and racism, against anyone standing up for female rights, despite the accusations being transparent nonsense.

I wonder what accusation will be next??

Fennel Wed 27-Apr-22 16:43:19

I think it was posted a few pages ago that the only legislation on this subject is the 2010 Equalities Act.
Categories covered:
Types of discrimination ('protected characteristics')

It is against the law to discriminate against anyone because of:

age
gender reassignment
being married or in a civil partnership
being pregnant or on maternity leave
disability
race including colour, nationality, ethnic or national origin
religion or belief
sex
sexual orientation.
I wonder how many cases of which category have been brought and how many were successful.

Doodledog Wed 27-Apr-22 16:51:52

It is also unlawful to discriminate against anyone for believing that transwomen are not women.