I will because I want to hear it straight from the source rather than media spin/interpretation so that I can comment later on what I saw and heard, when discussions start up as they surely will.
However, I don’t think they should be doing an interview at all (I felt the same about Diana and Charles interviews) these things end up backfiring against them.
DD found a box set of Yes Minister in a charity shop recently and gave it to us. We watched three episodes this evening. On balance Yes, Minister is a lot wittier but probably didn't make us laugh as much as watching the Oprah interview would have.
Didn’t you realise, all points of view are welcome on here Pippamoo, even from those with delusions of superior insight. What else would we do with our evening after all?
From what I’ve heard so far it seems to be more of a problem with the gutter press not the royal family. And, from memory, they don’t comment on untrue stories in them. And other royals don’t have titles etc.
What I find most odd about the story of curtsying etc is that Harry didn’t explain everything fully. He is Royal. He knows nothing else. It’s in his DNA. Are we to believe he didn’t guide her regarding all the customs and intricacies of the institution she was marrying into? We're watching the recording and I said exactly the same. Harry let her down on that occasion.
She also had an excellent, hand-picked team, not at all the Palace 'old guard'.
Not watching, for my own MH. Enjoying Hidden Figures instead - the TRUE story of a team of female African-American mathematicians who served a vital role in NASA during the early years of the U.S. space program. Fascinating.