Going back to the early post I see Day6 (Fri 05-Jul-19 14:15:51) has stuck with her usual far-right views.
The haves and have-nots have always existed. What's new?
Are we saying we should somehow cull the bright, rich, privileged and get them all wearing hoodies and using food banks?
You may not believe that "God made them, high or lowly, And ordered their estate." but those farthest to the right will always tell you that this is how it is, and how it has always been; as if the human race cannot develop. The farthest to the right, of course, will accept slavery as being the natural course of things. They will also express views about everyone having the capacity to improve themselves and see the fault of the poor and destitute for being poor and destitute as their own.
It is also a far-right and far-left view that the world is full of tribes. It is those farthest right and farthest left that have voted to cut us off to make us small again in an attempt to enable their tribe to have power. The UK hasn't, as far as I can see, ever had such extremes in my lifetime.
Is this because of the recent rise of liberalism in the world? At least in the western world. The days of the old powers of farthest right and farthest left are dying and this may be one last throw of the dice for each to try and return to them. The farther right (not the farthest yet) have the power and they have grabbed it through their accumulated wealth. The farther left (not the farthest yet) is trying to grab back the power by using and taking to themselves the power of people to use the state.
Is this all because of the changes in tribes or classes? The working class, the middle class, the upper class gave people such comfort. The knew where they belonged and didn't have to berate themselves if they couldn't get to the very top of the tree, they could be a success within their class.
We now have the cognisant and the none cognisant class and knowledge and ability to learn may be what we need for the future. The right, with their accumulated wealth (little or nothing to do with what people earn), tried to buy into this. The left insisted the state provided this. But neither has succeeded in keeping the reverence of this group, as the cognisant class tends to be more volatile, less attached to one group.
And they tend to be more liberal. This means they accept people who are different, are not tribal. They believe everyone is equal however they differ from themselves. They oppose attitudes which oppress others interests not just their own. They find and defend boundaries where, without the law, one group can oppress another. The law is most important to the liberal view. And we have seen nothing but flouting of laws in recent times.