Ah you’re right of course maryeliza
We did indeed have Hunt for 6 long (austerity driven) years.
This from his wiki page:
“In July 2015, Hunt became the subject of the first petition on a new UK Government website to reach the threshold of 100,000 signatures required for a petition to be considered for debate in Parliament. The petition called for a debate on a vote of "No Confidence" in Hunt as Health Secretary”
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Farage & party funding
(71 Posts)Did I read somewhere that a commission was looking into his funding as there were concerns apparently about irregularities or illegalities.
Has anyone heard anything on the subject?
We probably need a degree of higher taxation
The tories depend on economic illiteracy like yours to enable them to carry out their economic ruin of the NHS without any challenge, Ug
Taxation does not fund spending. Our state is a money issuer, not earner.
The stuff about having to 'live within our means' is rubbish; just about any economist will tell you that.
We have a 'sovereign' currency (i.e we have complete control over it) and can issue as much of it as we like because it isn't backed by anything, we went off the gold standard 40+ years ago.
I would love a discussion about economics and how money 'works' but no-one ever seems interested, despite the fact economics is fundamental to a society...
? Gun control
Not relevant here!
And crystal completely agree with you re NF - funny how your comment was perceived as a dig rather than based on comments he has actually made about moving to that type of system.
Urm JH was Health Secretary for 6 years - did you honestly not know that and all the problems he was involved with ( and caused) during that 6 years?
Stop getting your digs in crystaltipps!
I wonder why our government doesn’t go back to the drawing board and take into consideration ‘best practice’ from around the world? It would be better cross party so any changes wouldn’t just get chucked out by the ‘next lot’!
Any Minister for Health only seems to last a few months - it’s like having a ride on a bluddy carousel! Jeremy Hint, now Matt Hancock in no time at all. They must surely just be getting a handle on it when it’s time to move on.
We probably need a degree of higher taxation. If only we could ‘ring fence’ it for our beloved NHS people would be happier paying it. I think.
The French system sounds good and fair Joelsnan
I’m enjoying this discussion better than the thread title. Perhaps GNHQ can rename it Views about the NHS?
France, Germany and Italy all spend more on health services and all have excellent hospitals. But I don't expect Farage will want to copy anything European, he’s going for the US model. I wonder if he’ll make his views on gun control and smoking part of his policy now?
In France the proportion of GDP spent on health care is greater than in the UK
In France the health service is run completely differently. Doctors, nurses etc etc are independent businesses. So, if you go to your doctor and you need an x-ray he will give you an ordnance (prescription) and you chose which lab you go to. For a blood test you go to your local nurse who may well ask which lab you want to perform the tests. You have a carte vitale which proves that you are in the French health system and you have top up insurance to cover the difference between the rates for services agreed with the government and the rate at which you are charged. Generally the system works well but money changes hands and it has to be reclaimed.
some Trusts are £millions in the red and there is huge wastage and inefficiency that needs addressing.
Has it completely passed you by, Ug that the NHS has been starved of funding for nearly a decade now?
It was never intended to be a money maker. The state is not in the business of making profits. It was conceived as a public welfare service. The state would be perfectly able to fund it properly if the political will was there, but it isn't.
As to 'waste', I have no idea. I suspect that this is a story put about to support privatisation. I would be really surprised if any huge organisation manages to run without waste and inefficiencies, but realism doesn't suit the narrative, does it?
I'll reiterate that the money doesn't disappear into a big black hole. It all gets spent and much of it comes back to the state by way of taxation.
It cannot decide whether it is running a business (Trusts compete with one another for funding as the money follows the patient) or whether it is providing a service.
It's not that the HS cannot decide, it's that it's been put into this position by tory governments which are convinced that a service can be run as a business and that competition leads to efficiencies (and breaks it into nice convenient units for privatisation). The NHS is entirely at the mercy of government ideology.
I think France has health service where residents have to take out an insurance to co-pay for their treatment. I also think the French Health Service is good.
The NHS is a snake whose outgrown skin has split to reveal the bleeding flesh underneath.
It needs emergency treatment to staunch the flow.
Well that sounds awful.
But covert privatisation of the NHS has been going on for years. I worked in a hospital as a medical secretary for 35y and there used to be cleaners - then outsourced to a private company - Sodexo. The histology samples were sent from Manchester to a private company in the Midlands for analysis and reporting. Just 2 examples. Private companies are nipping away at the NHS.
It needs root and branch reform. It cannot decide whether it is running a business (Trusts compete with one another for funding as the money follows the patient) or whether it is providing a service.
Sad, but true.
Perhaps NF is just bold enough to face the facts. I don’t know. But something needs doing - some Trusts are £millions in the red and there is huge wastage and inefficiency that needs addressing.
Urmstongran I saw a video of him saying that he favoured an insurance based scheme. He said he felt he'd think he was getting better value for his money rather than handing it over to government to spend it. I think that's the start of a slippery slope and then you're like the USA where if you don't have insurance you can forget cancer treatment.
No, janipat I think he’s been quoted as saying the NHS needs looking at.
The charge against Farage made by his critics is that he wants to privatise the NHS. This may be his intention or not. But if it is, a true far-right fascist would surely seek to do the opposite: centralise the health service in order to monitor what kind of person is – and is not receiving – care, ensuring that foreigners don’t get access.
Not sure about understanding what ordinary people want. He doesn't believe in the NHS, feels we should move to an insurance based way. Of course he can afford high premiums if he has any existing conditions, but can we all? Think I'll be up the creek without a paddle in sight!
I think so too maryeliza. He taps into what a great many of the population think. Which is why I think his party, with their policies set out (not a manifesto - he says people don’t believe in those any more!) will do very well in a GE.
Scrapping HS2 is fine but investment is sorely needed in the rail network up north for example cross pennine. I’m sure NF knows that what with being a man of the people and all that.
He wants to scrap HS2. Gets my vote.
I’m all for replacing the H of L with a second chamber as I think there are real issues with uni-cameral set ups.
Yes I heard that mary and there was a couple of other things but I can’t remember what. He’ll be ok as long as he can be dictator.
Apparently he wants to abolish the House of Lords.
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »
