No, it is not an 'argument' it is the reality. The reality oncologists are very aware of and are very concerned about- of course about all cancer patients. So blame the experts in the field, blame the BMJ, if you wish.
Ignoring the REAL and devastating issues a bad deal or no deal could bring, to the poor people, and children, affected- is what is really sick and tragic- and as you say, certainly not 'mithering' (which Maw very rudely introduced), nor the time to 'chill'.
'Professor McKee said some of the most widely used medical isotopes can only be produced in specialised reactors, none of which are in the UK. The materials currently used in Britain are mostly manufactured in the Netherlands, Belgium and France.
Writing in the British Medical Journal (BMJ), he said there was “no excuse” for government ministers’ failure to foresee the problems that leaving Euratom would cause.
“Although it may be possible for the UK to remain within existing arrangements, it will be exceptionally complicated and the UK’s position will inevitably be weakened”, he wrote.
“Crucially, the government has offered no real clarity on how any agreement might be achieved. The position paper on Euratom published by the government in July 2017 contained little detail even on nuclear power and did not mention medical isotopes. ,