Whilst we don't have all the facts, I have read that at least ten people have been killed at the offices of a satirical French magazine in Paris where gunmen have opened fire.
Given the troubled times we are living in should publications try to rein in the content of anything that might be deemed controversial to certain groups because scenarios like this one will make it hardly worth the loss of life/ves, or should free speech prevail at all costs?
I am not going to disect all my words for you. It is all getting a bit silly dont you think. If you have a problem with me, take it up with gransnet. Or pm me. Or write it here.
I think this Pope is a rather clever man. He's taken the bull by then horns and said what he thinks - that the cartoons were insulting. Even the Pope is allowed an opinion and free speech.
Then by suggesting a punch on the nose, he is also saying that the barbarous attack by Islamist extremists (or whatever you prefer to call them) was not acceptable.
Had an insulted Muslim walked into the Charlie Hebdo offices and punched the editor on the nose no one very few people would have thought it undeserved. The Pope was perhaps talking about extremes of offence and extremes of responses and taking a metaphorical punch at both at the same time.
Soutra. Would you like to say what your real problem is with me, if you have one? It would might save your angst against me for the next few months? You can say on here, or by pm if you prefer?
To anyone on here who might criticise others' posts as "bollocks", may I politely suggest they stop sounding like a fifteen year old in a temper tantrum. It smacks of desperation.
So Pope Francis can't preach "about half" his sermons? How do you arrive at that figure? Would 1/3 be OK? Or 1/4perhaps? How have you arrived at your proportion? Get real. This is a fatuous observation attempting to show some insight into what a religious leader may or may not do. Of course he is highly unlikely to go around punching people, but mothers everywhere will be saying "Quite right too! You don' t pick on my mum!" Goodness, have you NO sense of humour? Or never heard of " muscular Christanity? You made a claim a few days ago(Thursday) to "know more about Christianity than the average person" but your posts sadly do not back up your assertion other than a somewhat fundamentalist and literal reading of the Bible- I dare not even use the word "interpretation".
As a child I remember being urged to "know your facts!" I commend that to you.
I dont see how the pope can preach about 1/2 of his sermons from now on after talking about punching someone.
No ambiguity either. I cant see how he can carry on being pope.
Riverwalk - apparently I can ignore everyone if I so choose Benedict resigned of his own accord. The pope may end up getting pushed out? I dont know if that can happen in the Catholic church?