Minimouse The absolute arrogance and rudeness of these Committee members took my breath away. How extraordinarily dismissive and bullying they were when speaking to David Babbs of 38 Degrees:
"We are not here to be challenged. You are here to be challenged. Let's understand the rules of it"
"Mr Babbs - we will not argue, we will ask the questions."
"Don't you think it is wholly irresponsible to be encouraging your membership to lobby their MPs to pull out of this agreement, based on an entirely pre-conceived idea that this is a bad thing for the UK, when you don't know, the trades unions don't know, the CBI don't know, so given the fact that you have not consulted any experts where does this arrogance come from that you presume that you know better than everyone else?"
David Babbs replied that, it being the case that nobody knows what is going to be in this TTIP Agreement, wasn't it arrogant of David Cameron to say he was going to "put a rocket launcher" behind this? David Babbs was immediately "shut down".
These Committee members surely have a duty to address the worries of a large number of people who are concerned at the secrecy of these TTIP talks. The member who said DB was irresponsible, acknowledged that nobody knows anything about what is happening in these talks. Given that that is the case, how is the Select Committee in a better position to argue that the TTIP talks will yield benefits for the people of this country?
38 Degrees and other groups concerned about the TTIP talks have noted the statements made by multi-nationals (e.g. that they want to get rid of "trade irritants" (these include things like certain Health & Safety regulations) and have examined previous and existing trade agreements to see what sorts of clauses are included (such as the Investor State Dispute Settlement provisions - allowing companies to sue governments)and have formed a view as to what the TTIP Agreement is likely to contain. The belief is that it will enshrine rules regarding automatic tendering of public services and other measures that will increase the powers of multinationals and decrease the rights of the ordinary citizen.
If these talks are so harmless and beneficial for everybody - why the huge amount of secrecy?
I am absolutely shocked by the way David Babbs was spoken to.
-