Today on Woman's Hour was a woman saying she was hated pre-birth and afterwards, as an unwanted extra child her resentful parents would have aborted if possible.
So an author with a book to promote (does BBC ever willingly interview anyone who doesn't?) was wheeled in to inform the listeners that a man called Bowlby had named something he called 'attachment'.
He concluded that babies like loving mothers. How's that for mansplaining?!
(Vaguely remember his cruel experiments on monkeys)
Book-promoter elaborated that people deprived of any experience of attachment find it difficult to know the way to form attachments and friendships as easily as others.
(Wow, hooda thought it?)
She announced that they tend towards isolation, and, never having belonged, are inexpert at belonging.
(Yes, she worked that out all by herself, without Mr. Bowlby)
Her 'expert opinion' is along these lines:
After no experience of close, confiding, supportive, trusting, encouraging relationships within their family, they are inevitably inexpert at forming close, confiding, supportive, trusting, encouraging relationships.
They don't feel confidently assured they 'belong' in groups.
They might lack confidence and high esteem, after a lifetime without any such relationships.
They might even suspect themselves to be 'faulty', which they are not.
They should therefore 'cure' their obvious 'faultinesss'. (!!??)
This, they can easily do, by "confiding in some of their closest, trusted friends". (Again, !!??)
Also, participating in the social groups they 'belong' in. (That's the triple hat trick !!??)
Can you spot the logic gaps? The interviewer didn't.