Susieflo- i think yours is a good idea- But for some older pupils then thats a problem in regard to their money-for food, clothing etc, and prescriptions, dental etc, as they get young peoples tax credits when still in full time education it must stop at 20 yrs- (or when they leave full time education) so who is going to pay for their 'keep' or living costs then, if it overlaps? (My other son was still at college till very nearly 21- due to his birthdate, so oldest in class) but got nothing from gov't from 20 yrs birthday- so i had to subsidise him out of my disability money- but some people cannot manage this- he couldnt get UC as still in full time education, and when he left college he got UC but they wouldn't accept his severe disabilities (which he did have on tax credits) and pay him accordingly- he felt forced into uni to get enough to live on, but couldnt keep up with his peers- now hes taking a 'gap year ' as he doesnt feel safe while covid is rife in his uni, and hes got health problems.Same problem for my youngest, (17) -hes younger in his year, but has been forced to return to college because if they boot him out completely hes got no full time education, so NO money to live on (tax credits) and NO free prescriptions, which he has a lot of due to his many health problems.So how would 'extending' the older kids education work, unless gov't rules changed towards their money to live on???