Faxgran
I’m afraid I’m another of the ‘personal experience —absolutely true’ posters.
Also the recent publicity about families on benefit getting reduced or free admission to attractions eg Tower of London, which I remember cost us an arm& leg back in the 90s.
Something must be done, I hope the country changes soon.
At the risk of being “boring” may I remind you that currently almost 50% of families claiming Universal Credit have at least one parent in low income employment, often two. Another fairly large percentage will be unable to work due to their own health/disabilities or because they are full time unpaid carers for a disabled person.
There are still far too many people scraping by on low incomes, where would we be without our care home staff, cleaners, shop assistants, teaching assistants, health-care assistants, street cleaners, dustbin-workers, all those low paid clerical and admin staff at the very bottom of the chain, so many people aren’t paid a “living wage” and are topped up by the government, ironically even some government departmental staff qualify for Universal Credit payments.
What about those who are mentally and physically disable and require 1-2-1 care? They too live on Universal Credit, why shouldn’t they be able to visit our historical places and leisure facilities?
There are no “separate” benefits available for people anymore to differentiate between those too ill to work, those too disabled too work, those caring for people and those actually in work but on low incomes, and finally those who should work but currently not in work or education. That’s why is called “universal credit”, it means if you were born with a life limiting condition you have to make a claim to the same “universal” benefit as someone who is a full time care, or simply unemployed through a myriad of reasons.
So so easy to judge!