What do you think Sarah Ferguson will do?

She continued her friendship with Epstein, she was recorded selling introduction to Andrew, think half million, it is easy to find full details .

Leave the country and not come back.

I live in hope.

I don't care

I can remember when King Charles was condemned for adultery with his now wife. Many people said they would never accept Camilla as Queen - I don't see many complaints now so in time will all the comments die down ?

The newspapers have to have a baddy royal,

Sarah Ferguson has not been Her Royal Highness since 1996.

Didn’t know she was royal. Thought she was a commoner .She certainly seems like one .

Some nasty, rather spiteful comments on here.

123kitty

Some nasty, rather spiteful comments on here.

What did you expect?

kjmpde

We need to remember that Andrew has not been charged or found guilty of any crime. There is no implication that he had sex with underage girls. The main accuser died at her own hand after personal problems - such as being banned from seeing her own children. Andrew may not be a nice person and should have picked his friends better but how many of us have dodgy friends, colleagues and relatives? Sarah Ferguson and her ex husband have both been able to live a life of luxury . Life will certainly change for both of them in the future but I'm not ready to stone either of them yet as I'm not a paragon of virtue

Paying £12m to someone you claim never to have met. let alone abused. smacks to most people as an admission of guilt.

but how many of us have dodgy friends, colleagues and relatives?
Yes, poor Charles and William.

2011 when she sent the email is 14 years ago. So why are we punishing someone for something that long ago?
She was probably very shocked when he went to prison and she owed him money allegedly
He is dead, it is 14 years, time to move on.

sazz1

2011 when she sent the email is 14 years ago. So why are we punishing someone for something that long ago?
She was probably very shocked when he went to prison and she owed him money allegedly
He is dead, it is 14 years, time to move on.

It's only recently come to light that Sarah lied about her relationship with a convicted child sex offender even calling him (after his conviction) a "supreme friend" and continuing the friendship even after his release from prison.
Sarah is not the victim, the victims are the children and women abused by Epstein (Sarah's "supreme friend").
14 years is the age of some of the children Sarah's Supreme Friend abused, tell them it should be forgotten as it's so long ago.

The daughters moved to royal lodge with Andrew 2006, Sarah joined them 2008, she and the daughters visited Epstein 2009, she emailed him 2011. Many reports and some photographs Epstein in Royal Lodge grounds

OldFrill

sazz1

2011 when she sent the email is 14 years ago. So why are we punishing someone for something that long ago?
She was probably very shocked when he went to prison and she owed him money allegedly
He is dead, it is 14 years, time to move on.

It's only recently come to light that Sarah lied about her relationship with a convicted child sex offender even calling him (after his conviction) a "supreme friend" and continuing the friendship even after his release from prison.
Sarah is not the victim, the victims are the children and women abused by Epstein (Sarah's "supreme friend").
14 years is the age of some of the children Sarah's Supreme Friend abused, tell them it should be forgotten as it's so long ago.

Great reply.

Sarnia

OldFrill

sazz1

2011 when she sent the email is 14 years ago. So why are we punishing someone for something that long ago?
She was probably very shocked when he went to prison and she owed him money allegedly
He is dead, it is 14 years, time to move on.

It's only recently come to light that Sarah lied about her relationship with a convicted child sex offender even calling him (after his conviction) a "supreme friend" and continuing the friendship even after his release from prison.
Sarah is not the victim, the victims are the children and women abused by Epstein (Sarah's "supreme friend").
14 years is the age of some of the children Sarah's Supreme Friend abused, tell them it should be forgotten as it's so long ago.

Great reply.

Yes, well said OldFrill.

This needs repeating:
Sarah is not the victim, the victims are the children and women abused by Epstein (Sarah's "supreme friend").

kjmpde

I can remember when King Charles was condemned for adultery with his now wife. Many people said they would never accept Camilla as Queen - I don't see many complaints now so in time will all the comments die down ?

Maybe you don't see many complaints but Camilla must be very unpopular in some quarters. There are numerous Youtube shorts deriding her and most of them carry loads of very unfavourable comments.

I can't see Sarah Ferguson coming back into favour any time soon.

Magenta8

kjmpde

I can remember when King Charles was condemned for adultery with his now wife. Many people said they would never accept Camilla as Queen - I don't see many complaints now so in time will all the comments die down ?

Maybe you don't see many complaints but Camilla must be very unpopular in some quarters. There are numerous Youtube shorts deriding her and most of them carry loads of very unfavourable comments.

I can't see Sarah Ferguson coming back into favour any time soon.

Er - these are in no way comparable, surely?

I'm astounded that anyone would think they are.

A sad silly woman whose sense of entitlement has damaged any good reputation she might have had.

Acting silly doesn’t always mean is silly

No, it could mean she is far worse than silly.

Not "silly" at all. She's duplicitous and conniving.

Allira Why did you quote my post? I don't think the two situations are comparable. I never said or even implied that I thought they were. I was challenging the concept that nobody complains about Camilla.

Don't give a damn.

Magenta8

Allira Why did you quote my post? I don't think the two situations are comparable. I never said or even implied that I thought they were. I was challenging the concept that nobody complains about Camilla.

I quoted two posts, not just yours.
I stand by what I said. Bringing Charles and Camilla into this is a red herring.

Adultery between two adults is quite different from the Epstein case.